“…will my name be mentioned?”
“…how often will that be?”
“…in what context?”
“…with whom?”
“…will my name be mentioned?”
“…how often will that be?”
“…in what context?”
“…with whom?”
I read that story at the Beast. There asshats came from all over America to disrupt a Pride event. Don’t they have jobs to go to and families to help support?
Such waste of energy and resources. That seems to be theme these days.
BREAKING NEWS: The Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney announces that she will make her decision on whether to slap Trump with felony charges for trying to overturn the 2020 election “as early as this month.” RT IF YOU THINK THAT SHE MUST CHARGE TRUMP!
— Occupy Democrats (@OccupyDemocrats) June 12, 2022
Well, we know what hour they will be on. Actually, I think it’s a mistake to change the time slot. I’m sure that because of the TV networks.
When you spend all your time on the dark internet and gaming in your mom’s basement, I’d say that shows a deficit of energy and resources to begin with. Jobs? Families to support? Nah… these are punks.
5th Amendment Time, Marky Mark???
Yes Klannie Oakley.
Count African-Americans as 3/5 of a person, men must own property to vote and especially women can’t vote.
My life motto: “Do what is right, and risk the consequences.”
My life motto:
Fuck 'em if they can’t take a joke.
Fuck 'em if they can.
Fuck 'em.
Having heard the recording of the call from Trump to Raffensperger about 50 times now where he so explicitly demands that the SOS “find the votes” for him to get a majority, it is really hard not to believe that any decently objective jury would find him guilty.
On the other hand, whoever takes the first shot, whether it is in GA or NY or DC, will be putting themselves and their family in such danger that I have no problem with the fact that this will be the biggest decision of someone’s lifetime. This will take true courage - certainly more than I possess and probably more than most people do. Who wants that kind of daily hell and hatred in their lives?
Apparently, Mark Meadows former secretary has notified him that she will no longer use the lawyer she was provided by Trump. She has hired a new attorney and will now be cooperating with the J6 Committee.
Oopsie.
These are mentioned explicitly in the 3rd and 5th hearing slots. As for the first item in your list, that sounds like it will (or certainly should) come up in the 4th hearing.
My point is that much of what you mention is likely to come up in some form or fashion in the hearings as they’re described here. And if Liz Cheney’s opening remarks are any indication, there won’t be any holding back when it comes to calling out colleagues if they definitely know something to be true.
@txlawyer has said many times that the GA fiasco was only worthy of a misdemeanor. Not a lawyer, but I could never see how it would just bubble along as a misdemeanor when it was a concerted and coordinated effort by Federal officials to flip a state’s election with multiple illegalities.
It’s right there in the 1st Amendment. “The Amendment’s prefatory clause [Congress shall make no law] announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause” that commands the establishment of religion. Heller, it’s not just about our god given right to own weapons of mass destruction.
Since the Jan6 committee can make criminal referrals to the DOJ, how many here think any of those referrals will be for TFG’s crimes?
The perspective with the chandelier is perfect.
Thank you for the correction. I somehow scrolled past the 5th Hearing paragraph each time I flipped up and down on the page. I will add that caveat to my post.