Dated a girl back in the 80’s who bought into that new age crap, she was shocked when I dumped her.
Pant pant pant… mebbe? Pleeeeze!!!
“That dereliction of duty causes us real concern,” Thompson told the Post. “And one of those concerns is that whether or not it was intentional, and whether or not that lack of attention for that longer period of time, would warrant a referral.”
Thompson added: “I can assure you that if a criminal referral would be warranted, there would be no reluctance on the part of this committee to do that,” according to the Post.
… … … …
Thank you mr trump lawyer. I am sure the court wants to know of trump’s guilt.
Ugh.
So is this the “Maybe we did it but it’s not illegal” stage?
I wouldn’t know why he would otherwise make this suggestion. It makes no sense.


The one in the back of that photo has literally hours left to live, doubt she’s smiling so broadly now.
Trying to drown out the Maxwell verdict in hope he can slither away without too much damage? It is his M.O.
Yawn.
First congratulations to Josh for trudging through the Bannon muck. Personally I don’t believe I could tolerate an hour of it much less condense any meaning beyond my disgust.
Second, the Orwellian thrust of Bannon’s work is unmistakable, that the only reality is what the Party says it is, but it also reflects an attempt to socialize the audience to accept and eventually prefer that regime. Hitler clearly understood this quite well viz
“…The people about us are unaware of what is really happening to them. They gaze fascinated at one or two familiar superficialities, such as possessions and income and rank and other outworn conceptions. As long as these are kept intact, they are quite satisfied. But in the meantime they have entered a new relation; a powerful social force has caught them up. They themselves are changed. What are ownership and income to that? Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings!” – Adolf Hitler on the distinction between Communism and Nazism (to Hermann Rauschning, quoted by)
I don’t think projection is going to work with this one.
Who’d’ve thought that this could be the thing in his life that puts him in prison - not even the end of his presidency, but he’ll be fingered by Ghislaine as being party to all of this.
Hmmmmm…
What’s the goal?
Try to push the SC to “try” the details of the case? … would seem to be a real bizarrely odd thing to do … maybe I’m missing something… but this looks like Trump’s idiot lawyer thinks this can be approached like it is an appearance in Judge Judy’s courtroom … or a replay of “My Cousin Vinnie”
Good point, actually. Follow the Trump.
I doubt it… Jeffery just snuffed it a year or so ago, it’d look awful bad if she did too.
Well, Josh, I’m sorry you had to listen to all that. Take a vacay.
Whatever it takes to put him away, either in prison or 6 feet under is fine with me. ![]()
I’m sorry I didn’t read Josh’s post, but the Ghislaine story was bigger news.
Tomorrow. He’s excellent.
She will not get the chance her lover got. Barr made Epsteins demise possible for his own reasons. She will be tied down and sedated if necessary.
6 ft under = excellent choice