Donald Trump on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to consider his bid to stay on Colorado’s primary ballot, taking the question over whether his conduct on Jan. 6 disqualifies him for office to the High Court.
Unanimous decision predicted.
Eligible.
Concurring opinions from open minded liberal justices will be a good read for way which 14/3 could be applied
“The Court should also overturn the finding that I have small paws. My paws are the bigliest paws, ever.”
States’ Rights Absolutists will decide that States have no rights here, even though all election laws are state-based. And the SC’s Year 2000 Presidential interference in Florida was just a one-time thing.
(( Further proof that there is no God means that no heads will explode due to the raging hypocrisy. ))
According to previous filings by TGF, should not this have to go to a lower Federal Court first?
Appeal from a state supreme court goes directly to SCOTUS. Indeed, you can’t even get into the lower federal courts on such an appeal.
Non-justiciable.
“The Court should also overturn the finding that I have small paws. My paws are the bigliest paws, ever.”
[/quote]
Bunny pancake can play thins game…
average bunny paws.
That 'do is some animal abuse right there 
.
This. I predict that if the Court grants cert. many will express renewed outrage that it refused Jack Smith’s request. The Court is hypocritical and partisan about many things, but not in this instance. The comparisons aren’t apples-to-apples.
Lawyers doing what they do best. Charging more in an hour than some people make in a month for the privilege of throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.
I see your pancake wabbit and waise you a garlic corgo with blep!!
Everyone hates lawyers until they need one.
Yer on!
I got video…
Checks barrel… sees bottom…
And then they hate them twice as much.
I have a cousin who is a lawyer… I don’t hate him.
Excellent!
Cats and dogs living together
(discobot is upset I better stop here…)
So, is an “out” for the SCOTUS to boot this by saying that the 14th says an individual can’t hold office, but does NOT say that individual cannot run for office?
So, then having a month or so to determine if elected, but “ineligible,” whether or not he can take office. In the meantime they can continue to work on their contortions to make the political ruling they want to make.
