The insistence on “diversity” by the Sunday Morning Gasbags and the rest of the Chattering Class smacks of a quota system.
Not a good look.
The public is speaking and despite the whining from those mentioned above, that’s the way it goes.
I was an early Harris supporter, and I’m sorry she’s out, but her skin tone and her gender had fuck-all to do with it.
I’m voting for the Democratic nominee—unless it’s Tulsi “Present.”
Which it won’t be.
Plus, 2 women, 1 gay man under 40, an Asian-American, a Jewish man - sure, that’s not a perfect rainbow. But that doesn’t reek of a non inclusive process either.
Yeah, a “male lineup” where 2 of 7 candidates are female isn’t a male lineup. 2 of 7 isn’t notably worse than when 20 candidates were running, and may actually be better. (wasn’t it 4 of 22 or thereabouts? They told me there wouldn’t be any math in this discussion)
Booker also wrote a letter to the DNC, co-signed by all seven candidates who did make the stage, asking the organization to reconsider the debate standards for the upcoming events… The DNC rejected the request.
Good. As much as I like Booker (and I do, he and Warren are the only candidates I’ve donated to) when you haven’t been able to increase your polling numbers over the course of a year, there’s no reason to change the rules to fit your losing campaign. He needs to call it quits but I hope he keeps working with the rest of the candidates because he’d be a good VP option.
They should do a last minute invite to Tulsi Gabbard, it would be interesting to know the reason why she decided to vote “present” on the articles of impeachment, is she angling for a job in the Trump admin? Why didn’t she go all the way and voted against? Women in general have shown exemplary courage in the fight against the wannabe tyrant Trump, but of course there are shameful exceptions…