Talk Heats Up Of Sanctioning Trump Allies For Their Election Reversal Legal Shenanigans | Talking Points Memo

The city of Detroit told the federal judge on Tuesday that sanctions are warranted in a case seeking to disturb Michigan’s election results.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1350855

Matthew 26:52 Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword."

4 Likes

Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

(a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name—or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. The paper must state the signer’s address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney’s or party’s attention.

(b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper—whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it—an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;

(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.

( c ) Sanctions.

(1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.

(2) Motion for Sanctions. A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates Rule 11(b). The motion must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets. If warranted, the court may award to the prevailing party the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred for the motion.

(3) On the Court’s Initiative. On its own, the court may order an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why conduct specifically described in the order has not violated Rule 11(b).

(4) Nature of a Sanction. A sanction imposed under this rule must be limited to what suffices to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated. The sanction may include nonmonetary directives; an order to pay a penalty into court; or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of part or all of the reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses directly resulting from the violation.

(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions. The court must not impose a monetary sanction:

(A) against a represented party for violating Rule 11(b)(2); or

(B) on its own, unless it issued the show-cause order under Rule 11©(3) before voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party that is, or whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.

(6) Requirements for an Order. An order imposing a sanction must describe the sanctioned conduct and explain the basis for the sanction.

(d) Inapplicability to Discovery. This rule does not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions under Rules 26 through 37.

24 Likes

It’s not Soros funded, FEMA run, Pol Pot inspired concentration camps, but I’ll take it.

Happy Christmas to all!

5 Likes

Hit them in the wallet. It’s the only thing rethugs understand.

20 Likes

More of this, please!

11 Likes

Now come the consequences, as well they should. But note that Trump himself will not pay a price for bringing multiple scurrilous lawsuits forward, either civilly or criminally, though hopefully, his allies, at least, will.

8 Likes

The wheels of justice grind slowly but surely. Ideally.

These seditious bastards should pay for what they’ve done.

15 Likes

10 Likes

He’ll pay indirectly. He will have a harder time getting any lawyers to work for him in the future, even the likes of Rudy and that kraken woman. He’ll be facing litigation in NY with a public defender.

13 Likes

This litigation model is the new normal for the GOP and it will only stop when it becomes untenable for the people bringing these lawsuits. The parties and their counsel. Wood, Powell and Giuliani should face disbarment for lying to multiple courts. It is really outrageous.

20 Likes

Wow. I haven’t seen that since I made it! Did you grab that here or somewhere else?

3 Likes

Sanctions aren’t enough. They should all be disbarred. Permanently, with extreme prejudice!

13 Likes

Most people are ashamed when they break the law and struggle not to do it again. THESE Types keep breaking the law until someone takes money or time away from them.

5 Likes

Someone else made it (i googled it)

I theek i still have a copy of it in my WP account, but now i have multiple copies.

1 Like

Nope. That’s mine. Evidently it has made the rounds. More than likely via Twitter.

7 Likes

Sweet! Do DiGenova and Toensing next!!!

8 Likes

Time for some people to lose their licenses and be forced to learn a new trade.

4 Likes

Ty for making it.

3 Likes

I often tell clients that the wheels of justice are square.

I love the South Park craps on Canada for no good reason…the whole vat of butterscotch pudding at the Canadian royal wedding thing was brilliant…

4 Likes