The Supreme Court blocked a Biden administration rule requiring workers at large employers be vaccinated or receive regular COVID-19 tests on Thursday.
Lets take this ruling and use it against the GOP.
Fuck.
Ugh, the disingenuous “major questions doctrine” is now recognized law, whereby SCOTUS will now just pick and choose which regulatory actions it wants to invalidate by arbitrarily declaring which ones are “major questions” on the basis of becausewesaidso.
The right of the sick to infect those who are not sick shall not be infringed.
Net positive, this is about the best that we could have hoped for. Upholding the long-standing ability to compel things using federal dollars.
Compelling private business in a private venue is a significantly different issue.
I’m just relieved they didn’t kill the whole thing, that would have been seismic and far-reaching.
Ok, Biden, time to pull out things like no-vax, no-fly.
I’m unfamiliar with “major questions doctrine.” Can you point me to a reliable discussion to bring myself up to speed?
Blood on the hands of the Corrupt Catholic Supreme Court.
Fucking hacks.
I’m assuming that the vaccination requirement for contractors to the Federal Government still stands? In which case, our local nuclear weapons laboratory could find itself bereft of its accustomed $4billion a year largess.
They’ve been allowing people to murder children in schools for years with guns. They’re only adding to the blood dripping from their hands.
I guess their “pro-life” arguments are arbitrary.
Your “pro-life” court votes 6-3 for the virus.
Could probably try to look it up myself but any ideas on how many of the 80 million still need to be vaxxed? “major questions doctrine” aside how much damage will this really do to vaxxed vs un-vaxxed?
In the meantime, look what these GQPers have been wasting time on.
And of course he did.
Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) likened the rules to the Nazi regime i
Whatever! Both parties are the same.
That’s sarcasm by the way.
This ruling doesn’t reflect adherence to conservative principles or doctrine. What it does reflect is uncontrolled libertarianism run amok.
Once in a while my obsessive but very non-legal musings aligns your well-reasoned explanations. This is one of those times. “Great! Now they get to pick and choose at will, while pretending there’s a constitutional basis for it” was my first thought upon seeing this news. What a crock.