I doubt it, since that’s explicitly restricted and one of the few things in the constitution not open to interpretation.
My own personal, non-legal feeling is that the president is not the single officeholder who should be able to insurrect at will and still hold the office, but also that it should not be up to individual states because that’s the one elected office that does not represent any individual state. Then again, that’s one more reason the president should be elected by national vote instead of state electors.
And while I’m on my soapbox, as long as we do have the current odious system, I don’t think a presidential candidate should be allowed on any state ballot for the general election unless they’re on enough ballots to win 270 electoral votes.
Obviously, none of that will change as long as they tend to benefit republicans.