Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1378061
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1378061
who were the two?
4 Likes
Thomas and who else?
2 Likes
Alito and Gorsuch
19 Likes
SCOTUS frequently surprises me with its unwillingness to blow things up, even when I have grave disagreements with many of its members.
Faint praise, but it’s not Donald Trump or Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell.
24 Likes
They seem nice.
3 Likes
Something is not right with the natural order of things when onerous medical bills don’t push the poors into bankruptcy.
18 Likes
Shockingly…NOT Thomas.
I’m sure his wife’s paymasters will be annoyed.
21 Likes
I’m just here to offer the personal observation that Reed O’Connor is a shitty hack of a judge. Thanks, Dubya.
45 Likes
Sadly…our nation’s courts have a lot of this type of judge now. Thanks mitchbitch.
14 Likes
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion.
Get ready for a wave of op-eds containing “…even Clarence Thomas…”
17 Likes
Gov. Abbot is going to mad when the power comes back on and he learns of this.
47 Likes
Was this the one everyone was sure that would sink ACA? or was that another one?
22 Likes
Psst… read the article.
5 Likes
When first published, the article contained only the lead paragraph.
10 Likes
No, it will be the next one. And the one after that. And then the next one after that.
Because GOP.
11 Likes
soph·ist·ry
/ˈsäfəstrē/
noun
- the use of fallacious arguments, especially with the intention of deceiving.
“trying to argue that I had benefited in any way from the disaster was pure sophistry”
- a fallacious argument.
- When the dissents in a SCOTUS decision are longer than the majority opinion.
12 Likes
Oops. 
4 Likes