SCOTUS Rejects Texas Challenge To Obamacare | Talking Points Memo

Founder & Editor-in-Chief:

Executive Editor:


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1378061

who were the two?

4 Likes

Thomas and who else?

2 Likes

Alito and Gorsuch

19 Likes

SCOTUS frequently surprises me with its unwillingness to blow things up, even when I have grave disagreements with many of its members.

Faint praise, but it’s not Donald Trump or Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell.

24 Likes

They seem nice.

3 Likes

Something is not right with the natural order of things when onerous medical bills don’t push the poors into bankruptcy.

18 Likes

Shockingly…NOT Thomas.

I’m sure his wife’s paymasters will be annoyed.

21 Likes

I’m just here to offer the personal observation that Reed O’Connor is a shitty hack of a judge. Thanks, Dubya.

45 Likes

Sadly…our nation’s courts have a lot of this type of judge now. Thanks mitchbitch.

14 Likes

6 Likes

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion.

Get ready for a wave of op-eds containing “…even Clarence Thomas…”

17 Likes

Gov. Abbot is going to mad when the power comes back on and he learns of this.

47 Likes

Was this the one everyone was sure that would sink ACA? or was that another one?

22 Likes

Psst… read the article.

5 Likes

When first published, the article contained only the lead paragraph.

10 Likes

No, it will be the next one. And the one after that. And then the next one after that.

Because GOP.

11 Likes

I repeat,

10 Likes

soph·ist·ry

/ˈsäfəstrē/

noun

  1. the use of fallacious arguments, especially with the intention of deceiving.

“trying to argue that I had benefited in any way from the disaster was pure sophistry”

  • a fallacious argument.
  1. When the dissents in a SCOTUS decision are longer than the majority opinion.
12 Likes

Oops. :blush:

4 Likes
Comments are now Members-Only
Join the discussion Free options available