RFK Jr.’s Long History Of Embracing Junk Science And Spreading Dangerous Anti-Vax Disinfo

Per Trump: “Mr. Kennedy will restore these Agencies to the traditions of Gold Standard Scientific Research, and beacons of Transparency, to end the Chronic Disease epidemic, and to Make America Great and Healthy Again!”

What “Chronic Disease epidemic”? I am not even sure what Trump or RFKJ might think this phrase means. The CDC defines it this way:

"Chronic diseases are defined broadly as conditions that last 1 year or more and require ongoing medical attention or limit activities of daily living or both.

"Chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes are the leading causes of death and disability in the United States. They are also leading drivers of the nation’s $4.5 trillion in annual health care costs.123

“Six in 10 Americans have at least one chronic disease, and 4 in 10 have two or more chronic diseases.2 Many preventable chronic diseases are caused by a short list of risk behaviors: smoking, poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and excessive alcohol use.”

According to another source:

“The World Health Organization states that chronic diseases are not passed from person to person. They are of long duration and generally slow progression. The four main type are cardiovascular diseases (like heart attacks and stroke), cancers, chronic respiratory diseases (such as chronic obstructed pulmonary disease and asthma) and diabetes. They usually last for more than 3 months. Common features of chronic disease are; complex causality, with multiple factors leading to their onset a long development period, for which there may be no symptoms a prolonged course of illness, perhaps leading to other health complications associated functional impairment or disability.”

Despite the WHO’s definition of “epidemic,” the word is increasingly used by medical practitioners and researchers to refer also to non-contagious diseases and conditions.

It’s certainly true that a number of chronic diseases have been on the increase for years, and many are caused by harmful practices like smoking (though far fewer people now smoke than once did) and poor diets. The HHS might well be able to do a better job in persuading people to change bad habits. But it’s not as if HHS has completely fallen down on the job here, and it was Republicans who mocked Michele Obama’s push to improve school lunch menus. It was Trump’s last administration that blocked bipartisan efforts in Congress to remove ultra-processed foods and certain dyes from federally-funded school lunch programs (remember Perdue?).

As for some other of the “multiple factors in the complex causality” of chronic diseases and their increase, one is an aging population. In 2020, 1 in 6 Americans was 65 or older, and the rate of the increase in the size of that population since 2010 was very rapid. The elderly will inevitably have more cardiovascular problems and cancers than the rest of the population. And one reason Americans increasingly live long enough to develop inevitable chronic diseases of aging is the improved medical treatments they received when younger and continue to receive after they reach 65. Programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act have increased the number of Americans who receive this improved medical care. Planned Parenthood, too. Vaccines, of course, have increased life expectancy. Most of those 65 and older received vaccines for polio and even smallpox, and for the three Tdap diseases.

Some chronic ailments and increased rates of cancer are “epidemic” not to the whole country but to specific localities and regions, often where poor (and often black or brown) people live – Cancer alleys around oil refineries, for instance. Increased rates of cancer in areas where industries have released dangerous chemicals into the soil and water. The possible role of microplastics in some cancers and other diseases. Asthma more common among the poor living in urban areas. Lead water pipes. Let’s not forget pesticides (though these have their legitimate uses – it’s mostly the people who apply them and spend their days picking vegetables and fruits sprayed with them who suffer). The list could go on. The factors here are environmental, many of them under the purview of the EPA.

I wonder how much cooperation RFKJ will receive from industry lobbyists and fellow cabinet appointees like Lee Zeldin and Doug Burgum.

And, to what period does “Make American Healthy Again” harken back? Despite our chronic health problems, it’s possible we’ve never been healthier, on the whole, than we are today.

I know it’s silly of me to occupy myself with a comment like this, esp. when I’m preaching to the choir. It’s just my way for now of fending off despair.

11 Likes

Odd that with all his willing acceptance of fringe and fallacious health theories he never got the memo on tanning beds.

4 Likes

Well that certainly wouldn’t be good…

(Thanks for the info)

1 Like

He ate some tainted pork and a worm grew in his brain. The worm ate a part of his brain and died, releasing toxins, causing inflammation, and creating a gap in his brain matter. Finally, he ate a lot of tuna sandwiches and ingested a lot of mercury, which required blood chelation therapy to remove. So he’s going to fit in just fine in the second Trump administration.

4 Likes

RFK as health secretary will have negative consequences for the health of the country. I hope his nomination is rejected. That being said, I think he might more accurately reflect what this country is currently about. We live in an age where dubious wellness and nutrition are the norm and perfectly legal. RFK is truly is a man of our time.

3 Likes

Fatso can make a contribution by putting down the Big Mac and fries and getting some exercise.

2 Likes

The red (fat) states will continue to consume fat and sugar and the blue (leaner) states will supplement their Medicaid claims for diabetes. Think Bobby will discuss this with the Fat Turd?

1 Like

I’ve been around health policy in DC for a long time. HHS is a huge department with numerous agencies. In my experience, the Secretary actually has little sway, and if he/she does, it’s minimal. Any drastic measures would take years to put into place. So, even though Bobby is an incompetent and crazy nitwit, I am not too worried. Hope I am right. That said, I do think Big Pharma needs to be called on the carpet. It spends more on advertising than on R&D. It pilfers off federal investment in science then charges outrageous prices. So, we pay twice. Biden and Harris knew that. They just failed to message it.

6 Likes

In addition to being a whore (he first offered his body to the Harris campaign), RFK Jr is a dangerous asshole who should be in an institution, rather than in a cabinet position. Thank you, Progressives!

2 Likes

He’ll do it by restoring the episodic Disease epidemics. You can’t get chronic diseases if you die from infectious ones first.

6 Likes

And yet, women apparently throw themselves at this schlub.

¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

5 Likes

If he does get confirmed, I hope he takes on food additives and colorants. I’d love to see the faces of the MAGAts when they open their bag of gray, flavorless Cheez-its or Doritos and Mountain Dew and Fanta are the same color.

5 Likes

The 2 years is valid. But Trump had many “Acting Directors” at the end of Trump I. No salary can also be valid, but it hasn’t been contested yet. F’example, Bush and Obama had numerous recess appointees.

It should be noted that, by an act of Congress, if a vacancy existed when the Senate was in session, the ad interim appointee, subject to certain exceptions, may receive no salary until he has been confirmed by the Senate. 5 U.S.C. § 5503 (2012). By targeting the compensation of appointees, as opposed to the President’s recess appointment power itself, this limitation acts as an indirect control on recess appointments, but its constitutionality has not been adjudicated. A federal district court noted that if any and all restrictions on the President’s recess appointment power, however limited, are prohibited by the Constitution, restricting payment to recess appointees might be invalid. Staebler v. Carter, 464 F. Supp. 585, 596 n.24 (D.D.C. 1979).

1 Like

Yes, yet another stupid tweet by Voldemort.

What got me laughing, though, was

“Mr. Kennedy will restore these Agencies to the traditions of Gold Standard Scientific Research"

GSSR?? As a 40 year scientist in University, Biotech, and Pharma R&D, I can assure you that science has its prima donnas like any career, but most of us check our work and conclusions six ways from Sunday before it goes into animal trials, and then 10-fold more if it advances to humans. RFK Jr has stated he will obliterate the globally regarded FDA and NIH, allowing for any snake oil that comes down the road on a horse drawn wagon.

GSSR? Maybe Voldemort is making a joke about glutathione-disulfide reductase with poor nomenclature? Naw, too stupid.

8 Likes

I’d encourage him to eat the Big Macs at every meal.

2 Likes

I had never heard of GSR and just read Wikipedia’s article on it. Well, read some parts and read at most of it, but learned some things that are very interesting. At its end the article notes breakthroughs in research on GR in 1955, 1965, 1977, and 1978; earlier it discussed possible clinical applications currently being studied. Which immediately got me to thinking, what will happen to the funding for research on any number of fronts? Research being done not only within government agencies but at universities, hospitals, and elsewhere? Links in the chain of research may be broken because funding is no longer available for projects that RFKJ thinks less important than absurd projects his tinfoil hat has picked up on or quacks have persuaded him should be pursued. We can only hope that the sheer size and complexity of HHS’s departments will overwhelm him.

3 Likes

Are you aware of Kennedy’s book on Fauci -
The Real Anthony Fauci is a 480-page[6] book written by anti-vaccination conspiracy theorist Robert F. Kennedy Jr.[7][8] The book was published by Skyhorse Publishing[9] on November 16, 2021.[10][6] It includes dustjacket blurbs by Tucker Carlson, Naomi Wolf, Oliver Stone, and Alan Dershowitz.[11]
From Wikipedia
The book accuses American public health leader Anthony Fauci of thirty years of abuse of power, during both the HIV epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic.[12]

In the book, Kennedy accuses Fauci of pulling off “a historic coup d’état against Western democracy”[13] and promotes unproven COVID-19 treatments, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.[14] The author shares his opinion that COVID-19 vaccines are not sufficiently safety tested,[10] and likens vaccine mandates in the United States to living under the rule of Nazi Germany.[15]

The book accuses Fauci of deliberately neglecting to use hydroxychloroquine in order to increase the number of people who would die from COVID-19.[16] Studies show the drug is ineffective against COVID-19. The World Health Organization recommends it not be used for treating or for preventing COVID.[17][18]

Kennedy also attacks the science of AIDS, spending over a hundred pages quoting HIV denialists such as Peter Duesberg who question the isolation of HIV and the etiology of AIDS.[19] Kennedy refers to the “orthodoxy that HIV alone causes AIDS”,[6]: 348 and the “theology that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS”,[6]: 351 as well as repeating the HIV/AIDS denialist claim that no one has isolated the HIV particle and “No one has been able to point to a study that demonstrates their hypothesis using accepted scientific proofs”.[6]: 348 The scientific consensus is that the evidence showing HIV to be the cause of AIDS is conclusive.[20]

He is a raving lunatic and a purveyor of conspiracy theories.

12 Likes

No, I wasn’t; but, it doesn’t surprise me.
So, it looks like RFK, Jr., is another in Donnie’s stable who doesn’t give a flying shit about who he hurts as long as their suffering helps to further his ends.

7 Likes

And supersize it.

3 Likes

Well, then there’s this:

The article is all over the place in a very irritating way but does consult some probably serious people (like a Harvard Med School pediatrician) who share some of RFKJ’s concerns, though not many of his remedies. (Not that the article sets things up this way. As I said, it’s all over the place. A NYT article. A paragraph about this here, a paragraph about that there. A jumble.) There do appear to be increases in some conditions and diseases among children (in which category adolescents are included) beyond the usual suspects, like type 2 diabetes due to obesity. But should an increase in mental health problems be set on a par with an increase in asthma? A taste of the article:

"It can be difficult to track the prevalence of a chronic illness over time because definitions and survey tools have evolved. Some increases in conditions like autism disorders, or anxiety and depression, reflect enhanced awareness and improved diagnosis.

"Among the illnesses that have grown more common among children are obesity and overweight, respiratory diseases like asthma, mental health problems, and neurodevelopmental conditions, a broad category that includes both the autism spectrum and attention deficit disorders.

"About 20 percent of children aged 6 to 11 were obese in 2018, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, up from 4 percent in the early 1960s. Overall, more than one in three children are overweight or obese, according to a new study.

One in 36 children is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder now, up from one in 150 two decades ago. One in four has a seasonal allergy, a food allergy or eczema. Rates of Type 2 diabetes, linked to obesity, and Type 1 diabetes have been rising among [people aged 19 and under each year]”(Trends in Diabetes Among Young People | Diabetes | CDC).

Note how the first paragraph I quoted is separated by several more from the last. The likelihood that the increase in autism spectrum disorders is related to (possibly entirely caused by) enhanced awareness and improved diagnosis is likely to be lost on a newspaper reader (who will not, and should not have to, read this article as if studying a Biology text for an exam). AND, the last paragraph lumps together with autism disorders with seasonal and food allergies, and eczema. And types 1 and 2 diabetes.

This is the kind of thing a student might have brought to me – I’m having trouble with my paper, so will you read what I’ve got here. My question: what is it you are trying to argue? “Argue” not necessarily in the sense of advocating a position, but simply in the sense, what thread or threads – what line or lines of thought – are you asking me to follow?

I also love, in the second to last paragraph, “according to a new study.” How many such studies are churned out each day? Why credit this one?

5 Likes