Report: Pentagon Brass Privately Discussing What To Do If Trump Invokes Insurrection Act | Talking Points Memo

That’s what I remember too.

If I may foot-stomp the psychological war: HELL YES! Trump forces the country’s head into a speaker for a 24/7 full volume Rush Limbaugh/Jeff Beck hate radio show. Trump’s secret sauce on all this Ignorance Stupidity and Venality burger is the forbidden White Supremacy Permission Slip Sauce. So now America, now that you have to live with this in the god damn White House, how do you like it?

Dear Leader Josh M opined recently about ‘future seeing’- what we seen and know today being much more clear and obvious in the future. Today we know Trump will never be a generally popular president and with his recent BS about voting and “riggging” while the law is finally catching up to him there is just no way in hell things get better for him. It will only get worse. And with the passing of the Notorious One, may the Gender Gap open into the Gender Canyon into which we all push the shriveled husk of the Nixon -Reagan (“Eleven most dangerous word”)- Bush (useless criminal unpaid wars) fascist war party down into it. All Trump’s got going is his Rush Limbaugh Show schtick. He’s losing bigly on ALL other fronts.

Sadly, White Supremacist violence is so baked into the American political cake, that the prospect (as per Rick Perlstein dedication in ‘Nixonland’) of Americans killing other Americans is very high. But what ever comes by the way of the “Tree of Life”/ Timothy McVeigh killers, it will not be sustained.

1 Like

probably will be already snuggled into a penthouse hotel suite in Moscow

Or his Robert Bork.

1 Like

FIFY

1 Like

OT the best part about privatizing the VA…is the opportunities for grift.

…the President should send federal forces to seize ballots in Nevada.

WTF?? For a democratic republic, that is the worst possible abuse of power imaginable. Straight from the twisted mind of Roger Stone, advisor to the president*…?

Because of course, that’s what the role of the presi… er, unitary execu… um, Putinista is all about, right? Manhandling elections whose results we don’t like. Next thing you know, they’ll be stocking up on Polonium Tea.

Who knew? Thank you, Mr. Stone, for enlightening us…

He already found his Roy Cohn. It’s William Barr.

1 Like

I can only imagine the kind of asinine ideas the brass have had to entertain from trumpp and dissuade him from in strong but simple terms. They would know what he’s capable of if he had the power at his disposal. I can’t believe we’re even discussing the eventuality of the military having to step in to save our democracy from trumpp and his minions. Jesus…

1 Like

Very likely there is a conservative interpretation of the Constitution that does not require the outcome of the election to be followed or prevents the establishment of a monarchy.

Quick someone call Johnny Yoo or recall Tony Scalia from the great beyond. They will write a legal opinion to allow Skanky Turdface, his Queen Iwanka and their spawn to rule our fair land for ever.

Agreed, absolutely.

1 Like

He’s playing you and you’re letting him. You’re falling right into his trap. He’s living rent-free inside your head. Don’t let him do that. Evict the motherfucker.

2 Likes

I’m not sure that DoJ has such direct jurisdiction over strictly military matters. That’s a whole other legal process and system that only falls under DoJ’s jurisdiction if statutory laws are broken. I don’t know that this would be that. There are UCMJ prosecutors and judges and they’ll handle it.

Unfortunately, yes, they can. Some are probably in the military and in charge of nukes or other WMD. Others are in law enforcement and can do much damage. Then there’s those militias. If they’re properly prepped and organized and have the implicit support of the administration, who knows what could happen. They have everyone’s name, phone GPS data and addresses. Not saying it will happen, but it could. The consequences of losing the WH and senate for not just Trump but his GOP cronies could be catastrophic, and the whole RW project could end if that happens.

So, they’re motivated, and capable. But will they?

1 Like

I walked right into that.

Fancy gloves, oh, wears old MacHeath, babe
So there’s never, never a trace of red

2 Likes

“Italy” has been an uneasy conglomeration of former city-states — including more old archrivals than you can shake a stick at — from day one. At best, it was first formed as an alliance of enemies-of-one-another’s-enemies.
That the Italian tricolor isn’t bandied around in demonstrations of performative patriotism should surprise nobody.

Italy’s performative patriots do, on the other hand, quite often wave around the flags of their respective old former city-states. Or wear/display those ancestor city-states’ heraldic crests, etc etc.
Or wave around soccer club gear. (Soccer ultras are VERY politicized; ironically, in recent years this has become less so in Italy than in other countries, e.g., in Spain FC Barcelona’s fandom doubles as a Catalan separatist movement, or in Israel Beitar Jerusalem is more or less an arm of the Likud party).

In other countries that are pastiches of immigrants with jus soli citizenship, there is every bit as much performative flag-waving as there is here in the States. In just about every single country in South America, for instance, the de facto flag corps is every bit as much in your face as they are here.
In Brazil absolutely more so (with the tiebreaker, if one is needed, being Brazilians’ absolutely inimitable tendency to wear their flag on — or even as — their clothing).

daughterfucker*

.

It’s high time we should stop dignifying them with this term — which carries, at least somewhat, the “well-regulated” connotations left over from 2A — and start calling them what they are: Street gangs.

Disobeying unlawful orders does NOT undermine “our entire system” (whatever the fuck that means). In fact, it happens all time. There are two choices (you even mentioned one above) for those refusing to obey unlawful orders: resign or get fired. So please stop insisting on something that simply isn’t true.

Robert Bork redux.

1 Like
Comments are now Members-Only
Join the discussion Free options available