Rep. Daniel Ratcliffe (D-TX), President Donald Trump’s pick to be director of national intelligence, has displayed relatively little interest in the spy agencies he’d oversee, never taking a House Intelligence Committee trip overseas to learn more about the agencies’ work.
displayed relatively little interest in the spy agencies he’d oversee
And why would he, his mandate is to investigate those agencies, since some employees still have the audacity to be loyal Americans first and to stay out of politics
Congress and the Intelligence Committee could actually improve if Ratcliffe is no longer there.
If the Republicans in the Senate confirm this POS … well, it will certainly fit the pattern and continue the downward trend of needing any ‘qualifications’ for a position other than fealty to and eagerness to help protect Trump.
And yet watch the pearl-clutching if some later democratic president nominates anyone who is not impeccably overqualified and right-wing-vetted to any position whatsoever.
He spouts conspiracy theories and judging from his claim that he arrested 200 illegals in a day appears to be a cross between the “most interesting man in the world” and Joe Isuzu. Tell me again why he’s fit to lead the intelligence agency.
I don’t think Trump has even nominated Ratcliffe yet. A few days ago on the WH lawn Trump said “If he is confirmed.” That sounded like the kiss of death. I’ll go out on a limb and say that we will get a speech or a release from Ratcliffe this afternoon - "It was an honor to be considered for nomination as DNI, but I love my family/district/dog too much to undertake that responsibility at this time. Earlier today, I informed President Trump, the bestest, smartest, most-handsome president ever, that I wish my name to be withdrawn from consideration. "
Why waste money on spy agencies when Putin tells you everything you need to know.
Putin does not have to explain anything ,you just do what you are told and say “yes sir”.