Prosecution Makes Final Closing Argument In Ahmaud Arbery Murder Case | Talking Points Memo

Closing arguments continued Tuesday in the murder trial of three white men — Gregory McMichael, his son Travis McMichael and William “Roddie” Bryan Jr. — who are accused of murdering 25-year-old Ahmaud Arbery, a Black man, while he was out on a jog near his home town of Brunswick, Georgia, in February last year.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1395679

Georgia?

11 white jurors?

Fait accompli…

4 Likes

Dad was a cop, so, traditionally they both go home.

Ginning up Red’s Coast Guard Service was, to them, pushing plausibility far enough over the line.

1 Like

“You can’t start it and claim self-defense,” she said. “And they started this.”

Instead of confronting him they should have shot him in the back as he was running away. That would have assured an acquittal.

2 Likes

I think the prosecution is doing a masterful job. Sadly…I’m afraid carefully constructed logic with loads of proof is beyond the 11 whites on the jury.

I hope to be proven wrong.

8 Likes

Words fail…

21 Likes

This bitch was on my last nerve yesterday. I didn’t hear her whole argument, so I missed this heinous piece of white fuckery.

11 Likes

3/4 of America can’t make proper change for a dollar out of a till.

9 Likes

But you need four quarters to make change.

5 Likes

The asshole’s rebel yell shit has not even been brought up…the Rebel flag license plate holder…that fact that the asshole used the N word.

13 Likes

It easy to defeat justice in Georgia. In fact it’s no feat at all.

4 Likes

FUCKERS. The assholes keep objecting and trying to say the prosecutor is giving the wrong reading of the law of citizen’s arrest.

The judge is getting annoyed. He keeps saying he will instruct the jury.

I heard one analyst say this is just to throw her off her game. It’s not something the judge would uphold.

11 Likes

O.C.G.A. 17-4-60 (2010)
17-4-60. Grounds for arrest

A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.

I see no mention of “offense is committed within the overactive imagination of a rebel dumbshit”.

18 Likes

In the euphoria of the Second Reconstruction, many got complacent. Years ago, when the U.S. was positioning itself to react to this Second Reconstruction, I saw and heard people behaving casually about voting–and this was before the Roberts Court gutted the Voting Rights Act.

Those who wish to take away rights seldom let up. The Prize is too great.

15 Likes

Dehumanize the black victim, it’s what she thinks will work.

10 Likes

Well, of course. Look at our stupid system for coins… 1, 5, 10, 20 25

Then compare that with bills… 1, 2, 5, 10, 20

Who the fuck thought that it was the best idea for our nice hundredths setup to go differently when you grouped hundredths into a whole…

2 Likes

There doesn’t really seem to be much clarification of what the offense might be. Is there a specific crime for which they claim they were arresting him?

1 Like

But it does give a break to white citizens in good standing that shoot black suspects with dirty toenails.

1 Like

They assumed he committed a crime. That’s all. They had no knowledge of a crime that Ahmaud committed.

10 Likes

The prosecutor is good, the defense lawyers have been particularly loathsome, and most people on juries actually try to do the right thing. I predict guilty verdicts all around unless there is a racist holdout on the jury who gives them a hung jury. Certainly there will be no acquittal or anything resembling what happened with Rittenhouse.

The most surprising thing about all of this is the the GA legislature took the Citizen’s Arrest statute off the books right after this happened.

15 Likes