And not a peep out of Romney since he was also “disturbed” - as far as I’m concerned they are all complicit in Trump’s criminality.
Murkowski ‘Disturbed’ By McConnell Vow To Coordinate Impeachment Trial With WH | Talking Points Memo
There’s uncertainty about whether he’ll grill it first.
An amusing cartoon from realclearpolitics.com…
No, they are only brown people who are mostly criminals and are taking good jobs at the meat packing plant and landscaping jobs that are so desirable.
My Trump loving neighbor is a radical pro lifer and supposedly Christian.
He actually wanted Trump to bomb Mexico to stop immigration. I looked at him like, hey, I thought you were pro life and Christian. He didn’t see any contradictions with his pro life or Christian beliefs in bombing Mexico…
And to get him out the average Janes and Joes need to see what they’re up to and maybe they don’t care either.
This isn’t his dad’s GOP
Brilliant.
Is “disturbed” higher or lower on the scale than “concerned?”
Where do " bothered" and “dyspeptic” fall?
She is putting party before the country. She swore an oath to defend the Constitution not the orange turd and #atmoscowmitch.
Both will vote to acquit, their states are thick with White Supremacist reactionaries.
At the end of the day she’s a Republican and they are never to be trusted. To her point though, doesn’t the Constitution require that the Senate be impartial during an impeachment trial? It does: "Rule XXV of the Senate Rules in Impeachment Trials provides the text: ”I solemnly swear (or affirm) that in all things appertaining to the trial of ____, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God.”
Technically I guess they haven’t taken this oath yet, but McConnell and Graham have preemptively nullified their impartiality, so who’s gonna call Bullshit when they actually do take the oath?
Also too, wouldn’t it be clearer if folks just came out and said McConnell in declaring his intent to work with the White House is breaching his constitutional responsibilities? I hear that “Real” Americans in the heartland are big on this Constitutional stuff.
Does anyone know what odds the bookies are laying on this?
I’ve said this before and no doubt I’ll say it again,this impeachment and trial are McConnells worse knight mare come true.He likes to lurk in the shadows and screw the little people in this country.Now he’s really in the spotlight and he is being exposed for what he is.Another land mine that he was quiet about,even though he supposedly was upset so he says.
“State prosecutors and leaders such as U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have condemned several of Bevin’s decisions, particularly his pardon of Patrick Baker, who had servedtwo years of a 19-year sentence for reckless homicide and robbery in the slaying of a Knox County man in front of his family.”
It all depends on context. In the case of Republican argument (Commonly known as a bad faith argument) they are of equal value. That is to say of no value at all.
Difficulties arise in the ratings scale when good faith arguments are made, but it’ll be a long long time and a lot of structural changes on the Republican side before we’ll ever have to worry about that.
I’m concerned that you’re disturbed, Senator.
But action expresses priorities: Gandhi
That she is disturbed by McConnell’s behavior is fine by me. However, reporters need to ask Murkowski -why is Trump withholding key witnesses and what do you suppose Trump is hiding?
The FIRST thing I want to see happen if we get a Dem Pres. is new sanctions against Russia that ban ALL Russian investment in the USA, including this goddamned thing. It’s an absolute scandal that this Putin asshole-buddy is able to do business in our country. (Thank you Moscow Mitch, you traitorous bastard).
That’s senate rules, not the constitution. And during the trial even the constitution can be overridden if the senate majority and the chief justice of the supreme court want it. Who are you going to appeal to?