My recollection is that the feds threatened to prosecute Cohen’s wife in order to get him to accept the plea deal. Bragg’s prosecutors are going to have to cover the ground thoroughly on this plea deal which is both an opportunity and a vulnerability for their case.
It is my understanding that Judge Merchan has ruled out Barr’s non-prosecution of Trump in the federal case as a defense in the state case.
Can anyone answer why the buzz at the end of last week was that Merchan couldn’t believe the D didn’t object to the question about wearing a condom…and that it would have triggered a mistrial?
All a Defendant needs is one improper question (what was improper about it?) and can get an automatic mistrial IF ONLY they would object in real-time?
How does any trial ever make it to the end, if what appears to be perfectly fair-game questions about a witness’s story can trigger a for-sure mistrial? I mean, I understand if the P asked Stormy about Chump’s role in an insurrection and failed coup.
IIRC, there were legal experts twittering that they missed their chance at a mistrial, and it was echoed by TPM posters. If that isn’t the case, I am glad to hear it.
An outward display of the requisite “loyalty” that was brought up last week. This is a prime demonstration of that testimony. ETA, but still no loyalty from his non-crime-family. ETA #2 - Having thought about ETA #1, i started to wonder if there is really any fundamental difference between his biological family and his crime family. Criminals, all.