Similar to the angry parents in VA who are mad at the education system (just coz) so they’ll vote for a guy who’ll arguably make it far worse or even damage it irrevocably.
Perhaps the Democratic Party, should consider investing, not in a propaganda arm, but in establishing a cadre of roving pyschological counselors.
["Yarmuth Calls Manchin’s Desire For Specifics On Inflationary Impact ‘Stupid’
‘Manchin says he wants information about what the inflationary impact is gonna be — where does he expect that to come from?’ John Yarmuth (D-KY), chairman of the House Budget Committee, vented to reporters. ‘Nobody ever calculates the inflationary impact of anything because you can’t do it. It’s just stupid — I’m sorry but it’s stupid.’
Manchin keeps citing inflation whenever he wants to show he’s not too cozy with the reconciliation plan.
Pelosi put out a statement yesterday squarely addressing his inflation concerns: ‘Build Back Better will grow the economy without increasing inflation, because it is fully paid for,’ she wrote. 'As seventeen Nobel Prize-winning economists recently wrote in support of this legislation, ‘Because this agenda invests in long-term economic capacity and will enhance the ability of more Americans to participate productively in the economy, it will ease longer-term inflationary pressures.’ ”]
KATE RIGA
3:18 p.m.
["Pelosi Says Getting Text Tonight Is ‘Her Hope’
Basically, the House is doing all it can while the Senate has to wait around and finish negotiating with Manchin.
The House finishing the reconciliation text is a good step for them — but the Senate is where the real hangup remains. That’s why House progressives previously insisted on a Senate vote on the reconciliation bill before they’d vote for the bipartisan infrastructure one (though they’ve since softened on that position, showing where the real threat to the President’s agenda is)."]
It would help a little bit, if the media didn’t treat this like some kind of hockey game.
Yesterday, I heard a reporter quizzing some poor guy, and all she wanted to know — all she wanted to know — was “when are you going to get this done.” Which of course is followed up by the templated story, “they said they’d be done”. And that’s it. That’s the “news.”
Consider…
He listed provisions on child care, pre-K and home care as areas of agreement.
Cool, huh?
What the hell are they??? Hello? News? Any info on the news? Maybe a headline reporting the news, like, “Democrats Plan To Up The Education Of All Children”? If that’s what it is. I don’t know. I don’t plan on reading the bill. I plan on finding a NEWS SOURCE.