Oh course they will. “It may not be good for America (or American women for that matter) but it sure is good for CNN”. They’ll bring on the perp running for pResident again as if he’s done nothing wrong over the years.
Doesn’t matter what your media acronym is. Cable and network news are so fucked up these days. They have so little integrity.
Wet blanket alert: I doubt any of the mainstream media will use that label for Trump.
Sexual abuse is a crime, and this was not a criminal trial that established as a fact that he did it. It’s what jurors thought was likely to have happened in a civil defamation trial. IANAL disclaimer, but I think Trump might have grounds for a countersuit if any media called him a sexual abuser when he hasn’t been convicted of that crime.
The jury determined that Carroll had proven Mr. Trump sexually abused her, but they rejected the accusation that she had been raped. Sexual abuse is defined in New York as subjecting someone to sexual contact without their consent.
One interesting note. The MSNBC teams says one of the Jurors admitted to being a consumer of some right wing radio person. HOWEVER, the verdict was unanimous.
Of course we’ll all have differing opinions here and I’m not saying I’m right. But let’s hope history records this as his first of many guilty verdicts.
Most likely because so much time has passed and it’s not provable beyond a reasonable doubt. Also he has a tiny mushroom dick, and Carroll wasn’t sure if he ejaculated.