Cool! So, picket abortion crisis clinics? Stalk and threaten “counselors?” Kill some of them in church? Blow up a few offices?
Sounds like a plan to me!
Cool! So, picket abortion crisis clinics? Stalk and threaten “counselors?” Kill some of them in church? Blow up a few offices?
Sounds like a plan to me!
Yippee Yi O Kay Yay!
I agree with much of what you say because I feel the same way you do about things but I realize that we can’t be fighting each other, and regardless of our differences in opinion we have to work together to change our situation and preserve our Democracy. I’m willing to do that. No matter who we supported in 2016 we’re facing a different enemy now and we must prevail at all costs. It’s not going to be easy.
I could not agree more. We have to bury our petty differences now.
The GOP claims assault and battery is legitimate political discuss
She’s Republican. That’s Nazi lite these days. If you can find any place where this person has unprompted criticized 1/6, Hitler or his tactics let us know
She can’t control (or search) domestic US Mail, either.
I’m not sure what protections are in place for courier services like UPS or FedEx, but they can’t interfere with the mail.
He’d better come out of this investigation facing assault charges.
It’s a feature not a bug. You can.do better predicting the policies adopted by those who espouse RTL by looking to.see what will.hurt women most than by looking to see what helps existing people.
His crime is on tape. We will see.
McDonald’s must have changed their policies. They used to have a standard minimum holding temperature of 190 F in their urns, and were dinged if the temperature was below that.
At 190 F all the volatile compounds blow off in a hurry, and what you’re left with is a nasty, bitter, brown aqueous solution of caffeine. A good description of it was “undrinkable”.
She is already a mass murderer of fully formed born adults through the Sturgis super-spreader events.
Liberals should start bringing doors to their political events - no walls or anything, just doors. The Regressives will see them and won’t be able to figure out if they’re locked, so they’ll just stand around waiting for backup that never comes…
Didn’t they lose a lawsuit when a woman was seriously burned by hot coffee?
They profile these miscreants.
The worst and the dimmest.
Before or after the trial?
Yes. Actually, they lost several lawsuits due to scalding coffee.
Back in the day when I was teaching statistics, I used that case as an example of the dangers of decision making with incomplete data. Most students were outraged at the idea that someone could win a seven-figure settlement for a coffee scald (which is how the verdict is usually described in the newspapers).
They changed their tune when they heard what really happened. (Note that this is all from my recollection. Some of this may be a little off, but the gist of it is correct.)
I figured the policy had changed when McDonald’s started advertising their McCafe nonsense. I’ve never tried it, because I avoid McDonald’s like the plague.
Just a quick note to second your recollections of the “gist”, @stradivarius50t3. I was working and going to MBA school when it took place and, as you can imagine, it was the subject of many discussions.
I also strongly agree w/ your description of the typical “attention-grabbing” (I guess we’d call 'em “clickbait”, now) presentation(s) in the so-called liberal media (SCLM). If one only heard the headline, yeah, it sounded outrageous; if one heard a sentence or two BEYOND THAT, one’s outrage would flip 180 degrees!
In Googling the link I provided, I was interested to note its reference to a documentary, Hot Coffee, which apparently discusses how this case became the ‘poster child’ example for tort reform (aka, “welding the courthouse doors shut”) and making it even harder to hold the powerful accountable for damages they cause or contribute to.
(I’ll have to do some checking around Netflix, etc., to try to find that movie, as I’d never heard of it before. It’s been an educational day, already! )