Sincerely hope that Rudy Giuliani and Jeanine Pirro don’t ever reproduce together.
“I didn’t see the intelligence about the need to concurrently hit North Korea, Iran, China, and San Francisco with nuclear weapons, but I believed President Trump when he said it was necessary, so I approved and ordered it (even though all the people who know about these things said it was all completely made up and crazy).”
This should improve our confidence.
You know though, when otherwise moderately competent people are forced to lie for a loony like Trump they’re going to look bad. Trump said Suleimani had designs on the embassy, but that wasn’t grandiose enough, he suddenly decided, so he declares that actually it was four-count 'em-four embassies! Wow! They had to zap him! And it’s pure fantasy. Just Trump making it sound good like he’s done for decades, saying whatever he can in the moment to sell you that goddamn car and get it and you the hell off the lot. Esper just says he hasn’t seen evidence that four embassies were theatened but he believes Trump. We know it’s nonsense, and he knows we know, and we know he knows we know. Might as well ask the next question, right?
Mark Esper on CBS: I didn’t see the intelligence about Iran posing an imminent threat to 4 US embassies, but I believe President Trump when he says there was one
That right there, is a world class record for lame attempts to cover the Boss’s ass.
They did
What’s the difference between New York and Canada?
In New York, they say, “Ay, what are you looking at?”
In Canada, they say, “What are you looking at, eh.”
Steve Buscemi in the original Frankenstein? Huh! But yeah, he’s always turning up that way.
Trump is living proof, if you are a Christian, there is no such thing as evolution.
Why won’t the SDNY charge him so that a judge/jury can send him away?
Yeah, but it’s good dirt!
https://www.bunge.com/news/black-earth-makes-ukraine-important-agricultural-destination
I know it is obvious, but anybody saying they believe Chump is begging for worlwide humiliation.
Between them or individually?
The twitterverse is treating his saying he hasn’t seen evidence as equivalent to a straight-up accusation that Trump is lying.
The clown show continues.
At this point, it would just be easier, and probably end the media questioning, if they all just said, “Yeah, we decided to assassinate a couple of high level government officials (remember, the one in Yemen failed - not sure what that guy had to do with the ‘imminent threats on 4 embassies’) of a country we’re not at war with on other countries’ sovereign land. And it probably violated international and U.S. law, and put thousands of Americans at risk. But, so what? Trump! MAGA! USA! Seig Heil!”
Exactly. The POTUS has access to information on National security that the DoD secretary hasn’t seen.
To me it’s more conventional ass-covering and the traditional D.C. thing of speaking to two or more audiences simultaneously with different messages for each. He’s telling the sensible people he isn’t gonna make it up. But he’s telling MAGAworld he’s not there to rock the boat. Trying to split the difference and of course we all wish him luck with that.
How many drinks for me to make it through just watching the interview??
One could argue that the timing of Iraq War in 2003 was a campaign stunt to get GW Bush re-elected gone bad.
Jos M. Wrote, “Getting Used to the Abuse”…Trump’s own people can’t keep up w the abuse.