Ginni Thomas Lawyer Asks Jan 6 Panel For ‘Better Justification’ For Testimony

[spacesaver]

She’ll be in like Flynn with the committee: Fifth Fifth and more Fifth. “Fifty Fifths, if you please!”

[tena]

A lawyer isn’t an office holder who can be impeached. You have to be somebody.

[daled]

@littlegirlblue

Wait til she hears there are efforts to overturn Loving V. Virginia

Perhaps, but wouldn’t the law (assuming we have an actual rule of law any more) allow for “acceptance” of prior contracts before the law was changed? So, in perfect Republican consistency, she already got hers, screw the rest of y’all.

[pluckyinky]

@tindalos

Thomas solo appear to be nothing more than a crank so it is connections and the people she connects that I suspect the Committee really wants to know about; i.e., she is more of interest as a nexus than as a perp

Methinks ole Ginni might have been using her husband’s position to make promises on his behalf. “Do this thing to help Trump and you’ll have a friend on the Supreme Court.” I would not be a bit surprised if promises to some of those states legislators got a lot more overt. “If you get in any trouble, Clarence will have your back.”

@tsp

That right there tells me that those conversations did occur, but that they made doggone sure to destroy any evidence.

…At least they think they did.

[pluckyinky]

@daled

Perhaps, but wouldn’t the law (assuming we have an actual rule of law any more) allow for “acceptance” of prior contracts before the law was changed?

I was talking to a lawyer friend about that. If Obergfell or Loving are overturned then those marriage were never legal and thus they no longer exist.

[carolson]

So the wife of a SC Justice - who is supposed to be the highest purveyor of justice is declining to testify to a Congressional Committee. Yawn.

[wintermoon]

The sun will rise again tomorrow. Donald Trump will tell another lie. Ginni Thomas won’t testify before the Select Committee.

These are among the eternal verities, and anyone who’s surprised by her sudden change of heart is a fool who hasn’t been paying attention.

[daled]

@pluckyinky

I was talking to a lawyer friend about that. If Obergfell or Loving are overturned then those marriage were never legal and thus they no longer exist.

This just seems so wrong

[irasdad]

@yellowbeard

The name Mrs. Sedition has such an alliterative ring about it.

Wait’ll she meets Large Marge and the Gargoyle Twins in Cell Block C.

They’re gonna have a real good name for Ginni…

[ralph_vonholst]

OT.

()

[mrf]

I have awful thoughts of them doing re-enactments of scenes from Roots.

[txlawyer]

@occamscoin

“What do you have on her?”

Basically.

I would respond, in no small part, that her testimony is necessary due to John Eastman’s refusal to testify under the Fifth Amendment. Who better to tell the committee the things that Eastman thinks would incriminate him than his best buddy Ginni?

[old_curmudgeon]

Your client actively engaged in a conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States by force and violence.

Oh, and here’s a subpoena.

[brian512]

@spacesaver

She’ll be in like Flynn with the committee: Fifth Fifth and more Fifth. “Fifty Fifths, if you please!”

Fifty shades of Nay?

[harry_r_sohl]

Here’s your justification: Fuck you, Ginni!

[lizzymom]

When she stays in one place too long, she leaves behind a slime dam.

[reggid]

@discobot

Hi! To find out what I can do, say @discobot display help.

Can you send this seditious bridge troll, Ginni Thomas, to jail?

[ralph_vonholst]

@daled

This just seems so wrong

Must appease their “Mean God,” Failson, Jr and crazy Uncle Holy Spirit.

[noonm]

The letter might compel the committee to publicly reveal what evidence it has on Ginni Thomas, a longtime conservative activist whose role in aiding those who tried to overturn the election has appeared increasingly expansive in recent weeks.

Yes, please do!

I think we are deserving of a better view of the ethics-free Robert’s Court either through the Jan 6th committee or other investigation.

[ralphwins]

There’s absolutely no evidence that the 2020 election was stolen, yet here we are.