Gabbard Sues ‘Political Rival’ Clinton For A Whopping $50 Million

30 pieces of silver (probably about an ounce each, about $17.80 this morning or $512.40 in total) doesn’t go as far as it did in Jesus’ and Judas’ day. Who is Tulsi’s financial advisor? Rand Paul?

1 Like

Yes, you go, Gabby. Straight back to Russia.

2 Likes

@steviedee1 but only if she likes beer.

Thanks Bernie!

1 Like

Straight back to her wacky pseudo-Krishna cult in Hawaii. Her guru-dev, Jagad Guru Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa, a/k/a Chris Butler is likely to be disappointed in her failure to get his cult recognized as a legitimate Hindu sect. If she’s lucky, he’ll be too distracted making sure that the tinfoil covers every square inch of his walls.

1 Like

He can go ahead and do that if he wants to lose the election big time.

1 Like

A good cry or a good therapist might help. But it’s been three years for you ajm. You have to snap out of it, get a new 2020 inspirational calendar and talk to it every morning. I’m leaving, back in Nov, so maybe that will help.

1 Like

Bernie’s past history remains relevant to this election unfortunately. Bernie still stinks.

1 Like

The Grifter can’t stop griftin!
https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/23/21077797/tulsi-gabbard-jack-dorsey-fundraiser-silicon-valley

Because we all knew that accusations of criminal behavior against her were as bogus as they are today against Biden.

Right, he was hoping for the trouble at convention instead of hoping to avoid irreparable damage to our democracy that he knew would be inflicted by Trump. You see it as a feature, I see it as an indictment of Sanders.

Yes, his unsubstantiated slander contributed to the problem. Once again, you see it as a feature, while reasonable people see it as a bug.

Clinton supporters (myself in particular) do not hate Sanders. We just know that President Sanders would be a disaster for this country. A lesser disaster than Trump by orders of magnitude but a disaster nevertheless.
(It’s not even Sanders’ political goals. It is his obvious lack of any ability – or even desire – to run the actuall effective government. For example Warren’s policies would be similar to Sanders and while she is not my preferred candidate at the moment, she would be far from a disaster – unlike Sanders she would be a positive for the country.)

1 Like

Because we all knew that accusations of criminal behavior against her were as bogus as they are today against Biden.

Oh please. You’re really pathetic. “we all knew” the FBI claims against Clinton were bogus.
You didn’t know shit. Nobody did. Plus Comey had it out for her husband. They had history but you I’m sure have no idea what I’m talking about (Marc Rich).

Give it up wo. You got nothin’.

1 Like

Hey @thunderclapnewman :
It’s been a couple, three days but the team and I have finally gotten permission from George to take a closer look into “you know who” :wink::wink: and his ties to certain foreign entities, if and whenever you give us the nod. (I added the :wink: emoji, 'cos that is ALL that was meant to be.) Just let us know if/when you feel any action is necessary. LOL
The HQ Team
SOROS Group International

1 Like

Hmm. If I were that evil Vlad, nothing would make me happier that have a rear-guard action trying to sow confusion and dissension among opponents of his hand-picked President. Tell me: Is your real name Natasia Redemptionsongski of 47 Volgograd Street, St. Petersburg?

And I shouldn’t have to point this out, but Sanders made four times as many appearances for HRC as HRC did for Obama back in '08.

I wouldn’t worry, woland. I doubt Sen. Sanders’ disastrous plan to turn us into a larger version of Denmark - Oh, God, the Humanity! - is unlikely to come to full fruition unless we manage to elect several hundred more progressive congress critters.

I think you stock portfolio will survive.

Well, some Bernie supporters are probably Civil War reenactors, and some probably collect Beanie Babies. Probably, though a plurality of Sanders’ supporters would imagine someone like Elizabeth Warren to be VP. No doubt the majority want him to make a wise decision that would help him win.

One thing you can be sure of, though, is that he won’t cynically choose someone who had a shaky past regarding women’s reproductive freedom as his running mate. You know: Like HRC did when she chose Tim Kaine.
@ajm @thunderclapnewman @daulphin

Given Sanders utter lack of coattails. -’ and he did try in 2018 he.would not have the.ability to enact anything.

Trying to undo the damage the his conduct of his campaign had caused and failing. And most probably bashing the Democratic party at every stop. And resolutely blind to.how a Russian trolls were railing his supporters.

1 Like

Too much Rachel Maddow makes the baby go blind.

I imagine that people will keep effing that chicken until the cows come home.

Even you admit that there was nothing:

If this is in any way relevant to accusations that Clinton committed crimes and knowingly damaged our country’s security by keeping email on a private server – then you really admit that there was nothing. Even Comey turned out more honorable than you are willing to be.

But I’m sure you waited with baited breath for the conclusion of all 10 (was it 20? 45? does it matter?) Benghazi investigations hoping that they will take Clinton out.

You might (or might not) be Sanders supporter but you clearly show that you will do anything (including an infinitesimal amount of damage you are capable to inflict on our democracy) to badmouth people you dislike.

1 Like

You presume to know too much about my politics, my stock portfolio and my concern about the said stock portfolio. You presume without the reason. As often the case, your presumptions are completely off base.

I have no problem with us becoming a larger version of Denmark. I have a problem with Sanders roadmap for achieving this goal. More precisely I have a problem with the complete lack of the said roadmap.

In addition, Sanders has no plan to elect those several hundred progressive congress people that are required (as you admit) to implement his… for the lack of a better word… slogans.

And since you admit that Sanders can’t implement his slogans, the question becomes – can he be an effective president within the real world constraints that any Democratic president will face? The answer, once again, is an emphatic no – he has no governing plans nor the ability to govern.

Once again, I want to highlight a contrast between Sanders and Warren. Both of them might name Denmark-like country as a goal. But, unlike Sanders, Warren recognizes that this is a dream, even if it is an inspiring dream. She recognizes real world limitations and will be able to take real world actions beneficial to our country. Sanders is unable to do so and by being a completely inept executive he would make the path towards his own slogans that much harder.

3 Likes
Comments are now Members-Only
Join the discussion Free options available