Discussion:

Discussion for article #230468

Any word from Larry or Curly?

This will be a strategy on their part. They aren’t going to admit that Saint Ronnie did the same thing as Obama so they’ll try and deflect it onto Bill Clinton. He’s probably just the first to do it.

The President has put these idiots in the trick box and it will get real bloody in there before they see any daylight. The Teabags are frothing like Boner the Orange gave them meth and powdered donuts for recess snack. Bamz is just gonna spend two years fucking with them. He’s playing long ball and literally has nothing to lose.

“between Americans getting jobs or illegal aliens getting jobs”

This is a construct that makes as much sense as

“between Americans getting jobs or Flying Pigs getting jobs”

Neither have any serious impact on Americans getting jobs… In fact both would probably stimulate American job growth.

Hayes should great restraint in letting poor Mo stick his foot in his mouth over and over again—and he never answered any of Chris’ questions.

If Brooks is all the GOP has to trot out for public consumption, they’re in worse shape than I ever dreamt they could be.

left out of the narrative is,I wasn’t sure this guy had all his marbles? really he looked so vacant and confused, fear of failure perhaps, lack of knowledge?was the Cclinton response real or just confusion Can the Republicans want to follow this “leader” how amazing and sad.

Nor will they state what should be done with the people who are affected by the EO if it weren’t implemented. Nor will they… I could go on but I only have so many batteries for my wireless keyboard.

wait… i thought the buzzword for the week was ‘monarch’… did mo work that into the conversation at all?

The very first question Hayes asked Brooks was whether he thought the Presidents’ immigration effort was criminal.

“I don’t know, I’m going to have to reserve judgment on that,” Brooks said.

In other words, no.

Yes. Watch this theme be repeated in the days ahead.

Well he meant to say, “No, because Reagan was white.”

Did you catch it when he said “I haven’t examined what Bill Clinton did”?

Edit to add:

Rep. Mo Brooks Magically Turns Reagan’s Amnesty Into Clinton’s

Damn! All those ‘Gotcha questions’…

Mo should have just taken the fifth…

The fact is that the Republican Party is blowing smoke out their asses, they have no legal reason for impeachment. Much like the “impeachment” of President Clinton, the Senate could not convict on the bill of impeachment. But the Republican Party continues to sabotage the presidency of Barack Obama, because they are at the very least racist and at worst are encouraging sedition because of their hatred of a black man in the White House.

The interview was so frustrating to watch – it was like two men having completely different conversations. Hayes would ask very straightforward questions, such as “Does following the law mean deporting 11 million people,” and Brooks would seize on some minor follow-up point instead, insisting to Hayes, “You brought it up.” Yeah, he brought it up, Mister Congressman, to get you to answer a very simple question that you’re making every conceivable effort to evade. STOP FUCKING DANCING AROUND THE ISSUE. You are ignoring every bit of logic while you whine like an irritable bowel.

Q: “Was it illegal when Reagan did it?”

A: “I’m not sure of the circumstances when Bill Clinton did it.”

Cowards, every one of them. The second you ask them whether they think anyone should be deported, they back away. Scurry away. Chris had a GOP strategist on the other night, and as soon as Chris broached the topic of deportation, the guy shut it down completely. Would not talk about whether illegal aliens should be deported.

Question for the Congressman: If you want to deport more people, will you raise taxes to fund the deportation effort?

When the President has to negotiate with absolute idiots like this he would be better off talking to a wall.