A well known socialist propaganda outlet… heh!
And the Koch brothers have a large commodities business, so they know about grain silos…
Considering he is already talking in tongues, that would be an improvement. Now he’s just hard to watch without without falling asleep.
No, it’s not. That was my point. Not even close. It’s well known in the news biz that the News Department has nothing to do with the Op-Ed’s. The writer of that article has published many articles that are liberal in their viewpoints, I posted a link to them.
Just like the NY Times. I find their Op-Ed page to have a lot of nonsense on it too, and mostly skim through it. But the News Department is excellent.
Op-Ed’s are opinions. I want the facts and I’ll form my own opinions. If I want to know about a piece of legislation, I read the legislation.
You just did it by making the false statement above. You said you did not care what this guy said, assumed he was some kind of neocon. Totally false. There are many people who won’t read the WSJ just because of it’s name. That’s silly. It’s no different than the FOX crowd not looking at the NY Times because they heard it’s “so liberal”.
News is news. Opinions are opinions. We need to keep these separate. The NY Times and the WSJ make that separation quite nicely. I read the news sections of both.
I’m pretty sure he’s been doing that for a while now.
Snakes…next step is to bring out the snakes.
1 Like
So there may be a limit to the crazy they will ignore?
Good to know.
1 Like
Well, fine. But why don’t they call out the rest of the Republican party for their ongoing outright lies or twisting on the same subject?
1 Like
Well, they were hermetically sealed of course.
That’s why his ‘wisdom’ is still so fresh.
Better get your order in to Hillary, or you’re going to find yourself in a FEMA re-education camp.
But don’t tell them. We want it to be a surprise.
1 Like
How can a brilliant former surgeon, be or become so friggin stupid?
1 Like
How does that correction make sense at all? There was no federal government at that point. The best they could do would be whatever local or colony government that they had available. That still would be like running for federal office with governing experience on a smaller scale. Carson has none, I do not know if this normally would matter or not, but it matters when a guy does not seem to understand much of reality.
Also, I am not sure how one thinks freedom comes from any deity just as a matter of course. They provide strict rules that are to be followed. That is hardly any sort of freedom at all.
Paul dismissed Kaczynski as a “partisan hack” at the helm of a "ridiculous cottage industry out there of people who think they’re smarter than everyone else."
GOTP -------so afraid of folks who are smarter than they.
Aye, the ‘Devil’s Three-way’
Finally someone with the correct response!
1 Like
This reminds me of that time Glenn Beck called Sarah Palin out when she couldn’t even name a Founding Father other than a 1st grade level understanding of “George Washington”.
They say you can tell a liar because their eyes blink as they speak. Just wondering why Carson’s eyes are always closed when he speaks.
No, the op-ed pages are not the WSJ. I see it daily because the wife is a banker. The news sections and business reporting are straight ahead journalism and that’s why I said that the newsroom is embarrassed by the shit on the op-ed pages. The only other place in the paper where the unhingedness of the op-ed page comes through is an occasional book review in the weekend arts and entertainment pages. A recent example being Nial Ferguson’s review of the new biography of Kissinger.
2 Likes
Sorry, I disagree. Saying that only the non-crazy parts of the WSJ are the WSJ is like saying that Wendy’s is really only the salad bar, and the 5000 calorie Bacon-Cheddar Quintuple Burger isn’t.
Dr. Carson is right! None of the “Founding Fathers” had any federal experience…due to the Federal government not coming in to existence until the Constitution was ratified. Carson is blissfully ignorant of how our government works, but wants to be its head? Over my dead body…
Salad Bars at Fast Food places are a joke, the dressings are more fattening than many burgers, and the veggies have big time preservatives. Your analogy makes no sense.
The reality is that by volume the News in the WSJ is FAR more than the skimpy Op-Ed pages. So your analogy would be like saying since Joe Scarborough does a few hours a day on MSNBC, that means MSNBC caters to a Republican agenda. Or that since Shep Smith is quite liberal, that means FOX is liberal. No in both bases.
It sounds like you never actually even opened a copy of the WSJ, never mind read it.