Discussion for article #223017
Idiots.
Grayson would have been great on that panel
Democrats are not very good at this. Alan Grayson should be on this list.
hope they are itching for a fight cause rethugs cheat and lie.expect more and then plenty more.
I don’t like it. Knife to a gunfight. No, not even a knife. A spork. Zzzzzzzz…
Excellent list, Cummings was one I was pushing for. Every single one of these Democrats is a professional and will do just fine in exposing this sham of a committee.
Nothing they can do to prevent the House from impeaching.
Grayson is too much of a narcissist, and the Republicans already have seven of them on the committee. Adding in another with Grayson would end up hurting Democrats, and fueling into the “both parties are crap” meme.
Pelosi did an excellent job in selecting COMPETENT Democrats, that is what will make all the difference. All five of these Democrats are competent and smart. Grayson is too much of a self serving clown, and he would be ineffective. It was his clown tactics that caused him to lose his seat in 2010.
You must be describing the republican makeup of the panel because these are five highly competent reps who will represent the best interests of the American people and Democratic Party and bring some honesty to the kangaroo court.
Caught between the “crowing roosters” and “wet hens”.
Can you elaborate? The five who’ve just been appointed can’t stop impeachment? Of whom?
Nice to see someone else here understand that COMPETENCE is more important. Too many progressives are being negative reactionaries because they didn’t get their way.
FFS, we get the RANKING member of Oversight on the committee who Asshole Issa cut the mic on and was lauded for in speaking even with his mic cut off, yet folks are whining that their fee fees are hurt because Grayson was rejected, GET OVER IT!!!
The president, of course.
Mark my words here and now. The House will impeach Obama over Benghazi regardless of the outcome of this committee investigation. They have already made up their minds.
If I am wrong, I’ll make a hat out of poison ivy and eat it with a side of razorblades.
Cummings and Duckworth are good, was hoping for Waxman and Grayson though.
So you’re suggesting that Elijah Cummings is a pushover? Tammy Duckworth?
We get FIVE competent Democrats, and all you do is GRIPE GRIPE GRIPE!!! This is why folks are hesitant to support the Democrats, too many folks like you complain when you don’t get your way!
Much as I would have liked the Dems to flip GOP the bird, Pelosi is doing the right thing. The Dems need to be there to cry foul at every turn and to shield the subpoenaed witnesses from abuse by the majority to the extent possible. They can also issue a minority report at the end. Kind of hard to do that if you weren’t in the corral for the whole rodeo. Pelosi has appointed Dems who served on the other Benghazi panels so they will be quick to expose BS when they hear it. It is what it is.
The wingnuts don’t need a committee to impeach Obama…They’ve got the House votes already. Leadership doesn’t have the balls to do it over nothing.
This isn’t even about impeaching Obama, it’s about tarnishing Hillary enough to make it a race between her and whichever dunce they put up.
/facepalm
Fucking spineless.
Not including Alan Grayson is further proof democrats cowardice, intention and unwillingness to win this or any debate or pick apart republicans during this charade. Not wanting to make republicans mad is no way to make your point the republicans