Discussion for article #224117
Well, well, well…
I hear those people were “lazy pigs” anyway, so who cares about them?
MOOCHERRRRZZZ!!! Leeches sucking off the Red, White, and BIue teats of Lady LIBERRREEETTTTTYYYY!!!111!!111one!!!
Now you’ve just got me hot. Red white and blue knockers are my particular kink. And when all three are on the same woman…well, who knew Lady Liberty was a Martian mutant?
Now we need a non-scientific pollster to refute the findings. Romney or Cantor’s firm will do. The Supreme Court was wrong on this and their GOP masters will pay a dear political price in the future.
Yeah and those numbers after suppressing the applicant pool of poor but unequal.
LIBS will be along any minute to bring us on the correct way to look at this news.
there’s only one way to look at this news: it’s good news!
Now wait for conservatives to log on and post why this is actually bad news…
If this isn’t unbridled tyranny, shit, I just don’t know what is.
I agree. You do know who LIBS is don’t you?
Headline news that the news will largely ignore.
One more anti-ACA argument goes right into the dumpster.
I sense a goalpost shift coming up.
A demonstration of what happens while an syphillitic drifter masturbates into a dumpster containing nuclear waste?
Are Dug the Shoveller and Shitburner going to come in screeching that Obamacare doesn’t work now? Or are they too humiliated?
Too humiliated!? You need to be a bit self aware and have some intellectual depth in order to be humiliated, feel shame or to admit an error.
This is such a good policy the beneficiaries might kick in a vote with their premiums. It will be hard to ignore a seismic shift in time.
Don’t say the nasty little troll’s name more than twice, or it will appear like Beetlejuice. Lately, it wants to be the first poster. I imagine it trolling continuously through the site, waiting to pounce on a new post as soon as it can, then quickly darting over to the right-wing nut-job sites where it gets its “information” to let them know about its blazing success. Oh, and replies to its posts it assumes are victories and it uses the commenting tools to tally them, so I’ve decided to never reply to its posts again, but merely comment on its idiocy in a new comment.
True, I was one of those people uninsured because of a preexisting condition (aortic valve aneurysm), a condition which only 1.5% ever experience a problem. Though I never had a problem with my “preexisting condition”, I was denied health insurance until 2014. Even a 1.5% risk was too big for health insurers!