Discussion: Speaker Ryan Says Congress Has 'Every Right' To Not Confirm SCOTUS Nominee

Discussion for article #246062

I always suspected that this man was an idiot. Now I am sure!!!

14 Likes

"“The president has tried everything he can to empower the executive branch at the expense of the legislative one,” Maybe if you guys had decide to do you jobs he would have taken any executive actions. But nope why break record as the most do nothing Congress in our history.

15 Likes

Ryan: We will not be doing our job if we didn’t obstruct everything that Obama does. Obama expects obstruction and we are merely doing what he expects us to do.

10 Likes

The party of government doesn’t work doesn’t work. Stop paying the asshats.

5 Likes

anybody tired of the “its them not us who are radicals”…?

6 Likes

Well, yes. They have ‘advise and consent’. If the pick is inappropriate, they have the right to withhold their consent.

BUT…it’s not advise and Fuck Off.

They don’t have the right to not confirm any nominee whatsoever.

7 Likes

You’re wrong, brah.

It’s ok not to confirm. But you do have to hold hearings. The Kim Davis-ization of the GOP continues apace. “Doing my job conflicts with my values so just pay to not do my job.”

17 Likes

Ryan, you clown… why don’t you quote the bit in the Constitution where it says the President is elected for a 3-year term?

8 Likes

No, you don’t, shithead.

3 Likes

Well, add another WING-NUT the jar.

TEAM CABAL…Republics are TRAITORS.

It seems they have gone from “Obama should not nominate anyone, and if he does, we will not hold any confirmation vote” to “well, we’re going to take it one step at a time, and of course we might vote to reject his nominee” in ONE DAY.

1 Like

No one is arguing that the Senate (not Congress) has a right not to confirm a nominee. The argument is whether this process should go on in an election year. Given the fact that the election cycle begins the minute a President is sworn in, the argument can be made that no nominee should be put forward because you are always in an election cycle.

3 Likes

Rep. Ryan, if you state that you must accompany it with the foundation for the suggested so-called “right.” Failing that, it doesn’t exist. Added hint: read the Constitution…

Yes, Congressional Republicans have every “right” to shoot themselves in the foot by demonstrating their ineptitude at governing. It doesn’t say so in the Constitution, but Republicans draw their ultimate authority from God, and He lets us fuck up as we will.

Of course, it’s the Senate that confirms SCOTUS nominees, not “Congress” or the House of Representatives of which Ryan is speaker, but whatevs.

12 Likes

Translation: “We can’t confirm a PBO nominee–any nominee-- with the Trump and Cruz Show running roughshod over our sacks.”

3 Likes

Sure, Congress has the “right” to do nothing on almost any subject. Once every year or so Republicans make a big deal about how they have a right not to authorize borrowing to pay the bills that it was their right to incur with the budget they passed.

It’s really interesting watching these guys try to whip themselves up into a hype so big that they can ride it all the way through to next January. It’s like watching a fat guy wearing a t-shirt from a 5K race he ran ten years ago trying to psych himself up at the start of a marathon. Good luck with that, fella!

6 Likes

This begs the question, would Republicans in Congress support a constitutional amendment stripping the President of the authority to make appointments during election years? If they really believe this is the way the system should work, let’s go ahead and make it official.

1 Like

No, you are not forced to confirm any nominee. However, the Senate does have a sworn duty to provide advice and consent so that the position can be filled. I am involved in hiring decisions at my workplace as well. I am not required to give any particular candidate a thumbs-up. However, if I refuse to interview any of them because I’m hoping that the HR department gets gutted and replaced a year from now, I will be fired.

You also have a sworn duty to look after the good of the country, and having a deadlock-prone SCOTUS for a year just to fulfill your masturbatory fantasy power trip is not in the best interest of the country at all; but, of course, we crossed that particular bridge in the House several years ago so I guess that is a moot point.

6 Likes