It’s as if everyone thinks this letter was his fairy godmother’s magic wand and he’s Cinderella all of sudden. Now he’s sane and fit for office? Now everybody loves him?
No, nothing changed.
15 Likes
You’re absolutely right, there was no finding of collusion. Because there is no crime of collusion - it DOES NOT EXIST IN OUR LAWS. So there could be no finding of a violation of a law that does not exist. Disagree, site the law which defines “collusion.” Dumbasses fall for Trump’s bullshit lies once again. Go play at Red State “nick.” Dope.
1 Like
Following Trump’s victory in 2016, Dems had 2 choices as to why it occurred: 1) Look at their own policies to determine if they might be a problem or 2) blame the Russians.
Dems decided to blame the Russians.
Yeah, but nobody does that now in academic writing. It took me about a year to remove it from my automatic mannerisms. I now do a reflexive search-replace to ensure that all are done.
I love the Oxford comma. It’s good enough, it’s right enough, and, gosh darn it, it clarifies matters.
1 Like
That’s a false binary, a two-valued orientation, black and white thinking, whatever your favorite term is. And a straw man. The “Dems” nominated the candidate who got the most votes in the primaries, but that candidate lost in the Electoral College. The reasons for the loss could be listed by 80 percent of the people here and they’d number more than two, pal. So just stop. Not because you’re insulting my intelligence, but because you’re insulting your own. Trump gleefully accepted help from a hostile foreign government. It’s morally repugnant. We both know this. Just stop.
9 Likes
You went with that one? I would have gone with this one: “When are they going to take an answer for an answer?”
What the what?
You mean like “I thank my parents, Jesus and Lady Gaga”? That kind of saloon brawl? Use the serial comma, people.
Oops! I realized I should clarify that the Oxford comma and the serial comma are the same thing, even though, funnily enough, the Brits tend not to use it.
1 Like
Beyond frustrating, especially when authors use quotations that can only be found on “inspirational” posters or, worse, in one of their prior books. I always write, “Please give the source of this so that the production editor can check the quotation.”
1 Like
I read books,did yardwork and hung out with grandkids.
2 Likes
According to Barr, who specified Russian government.
7 Likes
I either started or participated in multiple pun threads (who are you to judge me!?!)
1 Like
Multiple pun-threadality disorder.
3 Likes
You say that like it’s a bad thing…
Oh … not again …
Seems like we have to do this … every day ----
3 Likes
Classic AP hit piece… proving once again that the GOP has succeeded beyond it’s wildest dreams in controlling the narrative.
2 Likes
The DemoBorg has you assimilated for sure. Yes, I certainly have read all the fictional narratives. But sometimes fiction is not true, but Dems will never know that.
Ha. Benghazi, much, critics? Pffft…
1 Like
Schiff: “The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the president made full use of that help. That is pretty damning, whether it is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of conspiracy or not.”
This statement is still true.
5 Likes
See, this is why it amuses me to mock you instead of ignoring you as the buzzing fly you are. You think you know more than the “Dems,” you think you’re a rational person, but when asked to provide some sort of fact-based counterargument based on valid premises you have nothing. I know you think “Demoborg” is cute and clever but honestly you’re the people who believe baseless assertions without question and think utterly alike when told what to think by your plutocrat puppetmasters. This is pathetic, dude. Not a fact to be found. Why don’t you finish me off with a final, devastating “nyah nyah nyah nyah”?
So that we, the enlightened, can see both sides. 
1 Like