Discussion: Sanders Says Hillary's Emails Are 'A Very Serious Issue'

That says how I feel now. I like the guy, which makes it even more disappointing.

10 Likes

Bernie, no, it’s not a serious issue. It’s (forgive the expression) trumped-up bs by the Benghazi!!! committee, W-appointed government moles and GOP operatives, fueled by the intelligence community’s insane bent for overclassification (newspaper articles? talking points? unclassified stuff unthinkingly sent over the classified system once? Really?), eagerly purveyed by the ā€œmainstream mediaā€ – about a bunch of emails none of which was deemed classified at the time. No, Bernie, it’s not a serious issue. And as a Clinton supporter who’s nonetheless loved you for years and will certainly vote for you if you’re the nominee, I can no longer say I’ll do so wholeheartedly. Shame on you for this.

(Oh, and anyone who thinks if only Clinton had used a government account this wouldn’t be an ā€œissueā€ is delusional.)

21 Likes

What rules? Using an external server?

That was within the rules (and, in fact, John Kerry is the first SoS to exclusively use the State Department’s servers).

Handling of ā€œclassifiedā€ info?
The only assertions that I’ve seen substantiated would appear that the ā€œsensitiveā€ items weren’t considered as such when sent (All ā€œdroneā€ related content being ā€œclassifiedā€, even if it’s a link to a NYT story).

Also, the State Department email system that would be the alternative isn’t secure either, so it’d not be any different with regard to ā€œclassifiedā€ data.

It’s interesting how something, like using an external email server, that’s been common suddenly becomes THE WORST THING EVER, and needs to be investigated with an electron-microscope when it’s Hillary doing it. If I were cynical, I might think that this is yet another of the standard ā€œwhere there’s smoke, there’s fireā€ tactics that republicans have been making use of for decades (more Benghazi! anyone?).

19 Likes

pat lang’s blog; esp from his regular commenters/contributors.
although there seems to be a building consensus that she’ll skate, just like petraeus.

Iowa is slipping away from him. Slipping away for Tapper too. They put so much effort into the ā€œhorse raceā€.

9 Likes

Not sure why people want Sanders to act like Hillary’s legal counsel here and insist there was no crime committed when he has no way of knowing that. If it was just being investigated by a GOP House committee on a witch hunt that would be one thing. But it’s being investigated by law enforcement and it seems like a reasonable possibility that her decisions compromised the security of important information. Sorry, folks, that is a serious issue and no reason for Bernie to deny that. Is it the most important issue facing voters? No. And Sanders has gone out of his way to say as much. Even here he didn’t bring it up and is only acknowledging it’s not nothing.

5 Likes

#FeeltheBurden

13 Likes

I see nothing wrong in Bernie’s statement at all. If one of us was being investigated by the U.S. Government, we wouldn’t assume a cavalier attitude and just shrug it off. I’m sure we would consider it a ā€œvery serious issueā€. I know I would.

8 Likes

I’m disappointed but in TPM not Bernie.

This headline is click bait-y and misleading. It creates the impression that he brought it up. He didn’t and used the question to pivot to talking about issues that actually matter to middle class voters.

10 Likes

I just don’t see this as being a winning strategy for Sanders at all, if in fact he thinks it is a strategy. This garbage will cement his hold on his followers but I don’t see this as a strong gambit for picking up anyone else.

He’s pretty much gotten all the followers he’s going to get. His politics are so far to the left, he can’t get anyone else. By sinking into the mud of innuendo, he might even lose some of the adherents he has now.

6 Likes

Poor Hillary supporters, so happy when Hillary fights dirty, so outraged when Bernie makes an even slightly derogatory comment about her.

6 Likes

What, in his statement, focused on matters pertaining to middle class voters?

4 Likes

In fact, Clinton is not a target of the FBI investigation. More likely, they’re investigating whether other people who sent emails they’ve since determined contained classified content had improperly not labeled them as such.

14 Likes

Bernie gave his position on Hillary’s emails in that debate. Did a lot of good, didn’t it. What he is saying now is: ā€œWhy are you asking me? The FBI, or somebody, is investigating it. I’m not an investigator, like Darrell Issa… A journalist is supposed to inform the public with the truth. Go ask the FBI instead of a politician and become a journalistā€

Does anybody see how the idiot press leads your thoughts?

Think about Bernie’s wisdom. Go Bernie!

4 Likes

I’m thinking some of the commenters here haven’t watched the full question and answer, but are going ballistic based on the click-bait spin.

Bernie didn’t create this mess, Hillary did, with some poor choices, and more importantly the Republicans did, by shamelessly politicizing the whole thing. Bernie has called out the Republicans for the latter, and hasn’t piled on Hillary for the former. But apparently that isn’t good enough, he should also claim knowledge he doesn’t have about whether there was any wrongdoing or not, and should opine on national TV, when asked directly, that the handling of Top Secret documents is not a ā€œserious issue.ā€

So I think it’s pretty amazing that (some) Hillary supporters seem to think Bernie should be doing even more to protect Hillary on this issue, which, again, he did not create, and which he has very pointedly refused to make an issue of.

I encourage Hillary supporters who are expressing ā€œoutrageā€ about this to consider how much more difficult this whole issue might be for her if she had an opponent who was truly ā€œattackingā€ her on this issue, rather than just failing to defend her in exactly the way her supporters would like. (But perhaps these are the same kind of supporters who agree with the Clinton campaign’s shark-jumping claim that Bernie is running the most negative campaign of any Democratic primary campaign in American history – while at the same time ignoring stuff like Clinton attack dog David Brock’s disgusting ā€œblack lives don’t matter to Bernieā€ smear.)

10 Likes

So, just to get things clear in my own mind… it was OK for top secret emails to be stored on a server setup by someones nephew, is that correct? Seems odd that the NSA goes to such lengths to secure OS’s (selinux, anyone?) yet it’s OK to put top secret stuff on an unpatched Windows 98 box. Who knew?

(I’m not suggesting it WAS a Windows 98 box, or it was setup by someone’s nephew, but if using your own server, without federal oversight is OK, then that’s what we’re saying).

EDIT: BTW, As far as I’m concerned, the GOP can stick the whole server up their collective (not bargaining) arses, but saying that this isn’t a serious issue (that needs to be put to bed once and for all) is a little disingenuous.

3 Likes

Gee, thanks, CaffinatedOne, you just made this entire comment thread top secret and exposed our beloved TPM to an FBI investigation of exactly how the word ā€œdroneā€ came to be stored on their servers.

8 Likes

I’m choosing my dvd’s for tomorrow. I don’t need
ALL IOWA ALL THE TIME ALL DAY AND NIGHT !!!112!!!22!!!111!!1!1!1!one!!!
on every news program

It’s depressing how the talking heads frame this as ā€œif so-n-so wins Iowa then the nomination is settled.ā€ Are there no other primaries? Do no other voters matter? If Iowa settles everything why hold a convention or a general election at all?

4 Likes

I thought that Iowa was notorious for pick the LOSER? Michelle Bachman, anyone?

4 Likes

Remarkably coherent responses to this post. It is amazing to me how the possibility of being POTUS affects what comes out of a politician’s mouth…and despite what his supporters maintain, Senator Sanders is a politician. Anyone who runs for POTUS has to have an enormous ego to think they can handle the toughest job in the world and that includes Senator Sanders. It is my opinion that there is no way in the world that Sanders can be elected in this country at this time. I don’t think it would matter who the GOP put up against him (and Rove knows this). There are too many pragmatic Democrats who are uneasy at best with the idea of a ā€œrevolutionā€ and although they might not vote for GOP, they might stay home. If by some chance he were to be elected, in what universe would the Congress we have today pass any of his legislation? And then, as President Obama found out, when people are disillusioned, they don’t vote in mid-terms (I’ll show you, I’ll hurt me) and we end up with the Congress we have today. No thanks. #ImWithHer

6 Likes