Discussion: Sanders Paints Himself As The Dem Who Can Take On Trump After Michigan Upset

Ya know, that makes sense. Thanks.
d

1 Like

Sanders has not been subjected to the onslaught that Clinton has faced, and if he’s the nominee, it’ll be epic.

There’s a reason why Republican SuperPacs are running ads against Clinton, and for Sanders, and it isn’t because they think Sanders is genuinely the better choice.*

*Actually, Karl Rove does think Sanders is genuinely the better choice. For the GOP.

21 Likes

That’s why you’re cleaning Hillary’s clock in the dem primaries…oh, wait!

2 Likes

Yes, because nothing says 'merica, like two old white guys screeching and pointing their fingers at each other…

6 Likes

Same goes for Hillary supporters. The big question I have to ask is, why on earth did the democratic party let berns run as a dem? He’s an indy, he should have ran as one!

5 Likes

They’d do it to anybody, not just Sanders. So, the question is, has Hillary proven herself immune because she’s gone through it, or damaged because she gone through so much of it. Guess we’ll find out.

2 Likes

Personally, I believe that Hillary Clinton is far more electable than Bernie Sanders might be in a general election – once the Republican opposition bombard the voters with scary visions of socialism (which will be equated to USSR-style communism). Bernie is a really good person, but he hasn’t been through anything. Republicans are peeing their pants with joy Sanders is doing so well.

Let me state for the record that I believe Senator Bernie Sanders is a wonderful person with some great ideas and goals for the American people. I will have no problems pulling the lever for him should he succeed in winning the Democratic nomination. The GOP and FOX Entertainment will start a non-stop 24-hour (dis)information campaign about healthcare, free market and socialism. He hasn’t weathered anything. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has withstood the barrage of lies and disinformation the GOP and their various media have been throwing at her since the 1990s (and even before that when she lived in Arkansas). I also have serious concerns that many of the younger people Sanders is greatly appealing to right now are not reliable voters. I hope my concerns and fears will prove to be for nothing.

19 Likes

Nader.

6 Likes

But this was all eloquently Joshsplained away today, under the ā€œBig Surpriseā€ heading. ā€œThis win does not have those kinds of implicationsā€. It just doesn’t. The waters have been calmed, there is no such thing as Bernie Sanders.

1 Like

Me too!

1 Like

I’m afraid that’s on berns agenda…

2 Likes

And he’s treating this win as it’s Trenton

I’m good for whatever, but when he thinks that he’s going to go crazy out west, go for it.

4 Likes

I like Obama, I like Hillary, but there’s a reason why it’s tough for the incumbent party to carry much momentum into a third term. She’s still almost certain to win the nomination, and should still win the general, but there’s an advantage in going into the summer with a candidate who represents a break with the incumbent. Bush Sr went ā€˜kinder, gentler’ of course in '88; McCain failed to differentiate himself from Bush, and we all now what happened to poor Al Gore. For all his disadvantages, Sanders represents a clean break, and that can be a big plus.

4 Likes

Bernie has very specifically, very directly stated – repeatedly – that he will support the nominee and not run as a third party / independent in the general. He supported Gore over Nader, and criticized Nader for running as an independent, and has specifically pointed out the dangers of the ā€œspoiler effect.ā€

16 Likes

I’m okay as long as we don’t see President Anyone-From-The-Nutjob-Party. Having said that, what you said is what I fear. As for Hillary, it’s fair to assume her numbers already incorporate and reflect most information of her history – both her positives (her legislative/administrative experience as a Senator from NY, SecState, etc) and negatives (decades of right wing attacks, her Iraq vote, etc etc). Bernie started from almost zero, and thus far in the absence of close media scrutinies and attacks from the right, he has mostly been able to keep building one way up. It is still a huge unknown (and necessarily so as it hasn’t happened) what would happen once the Republican side unleashes their smearing/attacking machine against him.

I’m not necessarily saying he couldn’t handle right-wing attacks. Attacks are fully expected, we know what kind of attacks would come as well, and therefore he should be fully prepared to counter. And Pres Obama was in a similar position in 2008 after all. Then again, Bernie is not an Obama in many ways that are critical in the general election.

7 Likes

But, from what I’m seeing, that’s the situation we have now. It’s essentially Nader within the Dem primary.

I mean, if we look at Maine, where LePlague was only able to muster up a plurality, Cutler destroyed the situation for the Dems not once but twice. ME Dems ran a good candidate in the form of Michaud. But Cutler insisted that he was viable. Twice proved to be wrong. But it still gave LePlague the plurality because not enough people saw what really was a realistic candidate.

5 Likes

Trump will be using his middle finger.

4 Likes

We will hear more about Hillary enabling blowjobs than we can possibly imagine if she is the candidate. Both candidates are going to draw lots and lots of fire. That goes with the territory.

4 Likes

Shhh

Keep that dream alive

1 Like

Oh. … NOW he is a Democrat!! Really! Before he couldn’t be bothered! He is just using the Democratic Party. He should have run as an independent, which he has always claimed that he is!

2 Likes