Discussion: Sanders Campaign Suspends 2 More Staffers After Data Breach

While we all enjoy Bernie Sanders’ spoken word, the American voter next fall will need a little more than a President who can give Moses’ speech on the mountain.

Voters look at the campaign itself to get a sense of what kind of administration Sanders would develop. And here’s where this week’s activities is going to cause a lot of people to think twice. Campaign Director Jeff Weaver and Deputy Director Tad Devine are ur-Bro’s, the stereotypical Neanderthal White Male Privileged set, and they have built a win-at-all-costs organization. Steal the other side’s data? Then claim to be the victim? Destroy the Democratic National Committee? Mere collateral damage.

Also , one should think very carefully about all these people shouting that Debbie Wasserman Schultz needs to be immediately fired. The Party doesn’t change horses in mid-stream. She will retire after the course of this election, win or lose, and the several hundred people in the DNC will select a replacement. This is a normal occurrence.

In the Real World, the BS campaign is not the victim of the data breach. In the real world, Sanders would be prudent to cycle in a new campaign management team and IT division, because they have become the story rather than the solution.

1 Like

Hear that Bernie? The crowd has given them the thumbs-down; they’ve got a taste for blood and I guess you’ll have to kill them.

1 Like

Well, nothing good.

1 Like

Yes, and thanks for pointing this out.

Then he shouldn’t make promises he doesn’t intend to keep.

Because some mean people said some mean things about “this” I’m not going to even vote if Clinton wins…waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh! So very very mature, especially considering what we are up against with the Teahadist party. I hope you can manage to tamp down your inner 3-year old by election time.

2 Likes

When someone gets caught, there is always a price to be paid. I think it was classy of Sanders to apologize. Did DWS overreact? The harm had already been done, but some action had to be taken once the breech was made. None of this was the fault of the candidates or the chairman.

And how, exactly, do you know he doesn’t intend to keep them?

“No suffering was involved in the act.”

ASSHOLE

You make the call big boy, I’ve made mine.

Let’s not invest Bernie with some Godlike “goodness”. People in his campaign accessed data. What is the point of blaming DWS? What should she have done? Said: No problem! If these had been Clinton staffers can you imagine what the MSM would be doing??? Now that four staffers have been let go let’s stop the double standard. And just tell Bernie: no one blames you, but if 4 Clinton staffers had done this the MSM will be crapping all over the place.

1 Like

Moped?
Ice Cream Bike?
Antique Schwin?
Vroom! Vroom!

Doofus?
Envious?
Jealous?
Unworthy?
Unmanly?
Troll-that’s it, too!

Good mornin’ Lefty.

Since yesterday he said he was going to “suspend” the staffers. While, the day before that he said he was going to fire them.

That’s how!

mostly

So you didn’t actually read the response Chicago11 gave you. Ok. Thank you.

What I find interesting in all these debates here is not whether Clinton or DWS is ultimately responsible, or if Sanders is acting properly, but why the question of who the other campaign was that access files from a competitor? No one has ever named the other campaign that took advantage of the breach, and I find myself wondering why.

Yes, Sanders campaign people were wrong and have been fired. But, it was their campaign that first notified the DNC of the problem with the software back in October - software supplied and managed by a former Bill Clinton staffer. Sanders former IT director said he was back tracking the breach to determine its extent when all this came to light, so if you assume that he has nothing left to lose, why make the comment?

Is it possible that the breach identified in October was never removed by the software company, and that it was only blocked until the Sanders campaign backed off its investigation?

Is it possible that the entire thing was not done with any knowledge of Hillary Clinton, but rather was something set up by the DNC and DWS with the software firm to allow Clinton’s IT staff access to other campaigns’ information on instructions or at the very least acknowledgement by Bill Clinton? Bill Clinton is not above dirty politics, never has been. He was the one who made racism an issue in 2008, he was the one who drove out the advisers who were telling HRC to limit his presence in her campaign, and he is the one who has a less than stellar reputation for respecting his wife in private. Bill Clinton has an ego that will never let his wife shine above him, and she is willing to allow it.

She may have a huge organization, but she still has large unfavorable rankings in the polls, even among many Democrats, and a good bit of it stems from Bill and his behaviors. Bill Clinton took over his wife’s campaign in 2008 and she lost to Barack Obama. He may be trying to do the same thing here with a modern day “Watergate” type tactic against the Sanders campaign, but it may well backfire on him since Sanders is actually a very astute politician and campaigner in his own right.

Yes, the Sanders supporters are looking at DWS and HRC colluding, but I am not sure that HRC was behind this, and the fact that the other campaign that took advantage of this breach is not being named makes me look squarely at the HRC IT team and Bill Clinton. DWS practically swoons around him, and he does have the ability to manipulate women down to a science even today. And where her husband’s actions are concerned, HRC has years of putting her head in the sand. So look at the players, and then consider my question: who else benefits from the breach since it supposedly affected all campaigns and only Sanders’ campaign brought it to the DNC last October?

I was responding to you. But thanks for playing.

Wow. My question - to which you were responding - was regarding your response to Chicago11, who explained Sanders hadn’t fired those staffers yet. But yeah, I’m done “playing” since it is obviously impossible to have anything resembling a conversation with you.