Discussion for article #246014
Nice effing revisionist try-- but sadly, no; not gonna’ stick.
jw1
Hey, Crubio. Can you think of anyone else who had a chance to take out OBL?
Six months after September 11:
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/05/02/162774/bush-bin-laden/
“So I’m actually still not quite clear,” Todd said. “Are you putting 9/11 on Bill Clinton?”
“No, I’m putting it on his decision not to take out bin Laden, absolutely,” Rubio said.
Putting aside the Palin-like speech patterns and the insane premise, I don’t think “clarifies” is the right description.
I blame Osama Bin Laden’s mother for not doing the responsible thing by aborting Fetus Bin Laden.
And of course every Democratic President before George W.Bush.
When Clinton tried to take out OBL, the Republicans accused him of wagging the dog to distract from the all-important Lewinsky issue. Maybe if they hadn’t been so hungry for scandal . . .
follow up question…
do you think it was W’s fault for leaving bin Laden alive for his 8 years and not worrying because he was living in a cave somewhere?
or is that Obama’s fault too?
I don’t blame George Bush for 9/11. I’m only blaming his decision to ignore the warnings he received from the intelligence community about a possible attack by Al Qaeda.
Much ado about nothing.
Little Marco’s political career is over.
There is no low to which these disgusting people will stoop.
Yes and Chuck Todd pointed that out too didn’t he? (snark)
What a terrible memory’s that Republicans have!
Q: Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?
A: Probably not, and it would not have mattered anyway as there was no evidence at the time that bin Laden had committed any crimes against American citizens.
[Insert your choice of Rubio-as-malfunctioning-robot joke here.]
Yet did you notice that he is booked on all five (5!) of the major Sunday morning news programs today?
And since his basic weakness has been unmasked, he’ll have to go full scumbag to prove his bona-fides.
This will be ugly.
The Party of Personal Responsibility speaks, huh? lmao
So everything al Qaeda has done since Bush let bin Lada escape Tora Bora so he could invade Iraq is on Bush? Including Isis?
Hey, it’s your game. I’m just playing it.
I don’t know who you are, but jacking peoples accounts is not appreciated. Like the real ProfessorP would write a ten-word post. Pffft.
That is exactly right, but the media will never say it because they were right there sniffing panties along with Clinton’s GOP opponents.
If you put this together with the idea that President Obama shouldn’t be allowed to nominate a Supreme Court Justice in the last year of his Presidency, apparently a President is only responsible for up to six years.
Anything that happens in the first year is the predecessor’s fault, and they’re not allowed to do anything in their last year.