Just like you wanted for Harvey Weinstein, right?
Gillibrand: crickets
Edit: I still fume over this and am starting to lean towards her doing it because it got rid of a potential 2020 rival…even though I’m pretty sure Franken was happy staying a Senator. Still, can’t get that thought out of my head though. She stinks on ice.
Ronna …
Just go speak with him yourself … ya know …
get the ’ stink ’ on this from his own perspective ----
Just be careful what you wear … OK ? ? …
Oh please: you were screaming for Dems to turn over Weinstein donations within 24 hours of the story.
Al Franken was hounded from the Senate.
Take your “due process” and shove it, Ms. Romney-McDaniels.
The First Rule of Politics applies: IOKIYAR.
I suspect the process that’s due is to just wait until the fuss blows over.
OT Peter Baker saying that both parties are claiming that their memos contain facts, and we can’t really know who’s right, because we haven’t seen the memos.
Thanks, Peter, for that great reporting.
Like Al Franken got.
I wish our side had insisted on due process for Al Franken, but that ship has sailed.
Yes, what’s this about Franken not denying it? He didn’t get his day in court.
Isn’t the millions in hush money payouts “due process” enough?
Not at all. The WSJ only talked to 150 or so witnesses to Wynn’s debauchery. They were all wrong…
Folks this why republicans always win. Gop point fingers at dems they cave…dems points fingers at GOP they say so and then everyone goes on about their business
But dems got to learn to play the gop game
Yes, and no doubt left some sort of paper trail.
Not clear which part. Lying? Cheating? Misogyny? Hypocrisy?
The royalties they’d have to pay to the GOP would bankrupt the Democrat’s…
You mean the same Due Process Senator Franken got?
Jebus Tapdancing Christ
They just don’t give a fuck what anyone thinks do they?