Friends on other comment boards say CT and MA will not comply.
This resistance is spreading - CA, MA, VA and RI have publicly announced that they will not comply. Love this!!!
So we are not going to comply with this. And as I say, Iâm alarmed they are even asking for it.
âThereâs no reason to provide this data,â Raimondo said. âAgain, we donât know why they want this."
âBut I certainly have my suspicions,â she added.
I read that CT said it would, which I thought was both surprising and weird.
Add KY.
Sheâs Indianaâs Secretary of State
I thought voting was at heart a stateâs issue, not a federal issue. If so, what right, if any, do the Feds have in demanding the states comply or even in instigating a nationwide assessment?
While the federal government needs to ensure civil rights are protected and the Constitution adhered to, thereâs nothing that allows them to go on a witch hunt.
Surely Kobach could have foreseen the blue-state resistance. This is just a propaganda exercise to rile up the base and further divide the nation. Look for Kobach statements like, 'What are these blue states afraid of? Who are they protecting? âWhy are they opposed to securing our elections?â
I did too, as did a CT friend who called them and they told her absolutely not.
called and wrote Wolf in PA. No statement released yet.
LeftCat is not amused.
His name is Donald
Republican? Doesnât the Albino, Hoosier, Dwarf have some pull here?
Though she is a commission member, Connie Lawson is a modern day Republican.
OK, first state to say yes - Texas or Arizona?
Theyâll tell him to speak to DHS about election securityâthatâs what concerns blue states
Posted these in another thread.
Que est que câest: âmodern Republicanâ. Is that like a âmodern-day daguerreotypistâ