Beg your pardon?
2 Likes
Yes. And I suppose Trump would have made that move earlier. But, were he to file thereās always a chance a judge could halt sales pending some sort of ruling. Just becuase itās on your shelves doesnāt mean youāre free to ignore a judicial ruling halting sales. Wouldnāt stop all from getting out, but would sure as hell curtail exposure.
Why? Iām sorry I donāt understand.
1 Like
3 Likes
I would suspect thatās right.
3 Likes
Based on the actions of the defense, he is clearly counting on having his sentence commutedā¦
Or heās going to flip for Mueller
3 Likes
Well you can see it that way if you like, but mainly it just means that there isnāt a defense to present. And juries donāt like defendants who donāt testify.
10 Likes
We all know that he has no defense and that he is guiltyā¦
But that is not really the issueā¦
1 Like
Manafort looks to be SOL, and this is more bad news for Trump:
-Only 34 percent of Americans approve of Trumpās handling of the Russia investigation, vs. 55 percent who disapprove.
-58 percent say this is a serious matter that should be investigated, vs. only 37 percent who think itās
an effort to discredit Trump.
-56 percent say Trump has interfered with the investigation, vs. only 38 percent who say he has not.
-Only 37 percent say the things Trump has said publicly about the investigation are true, vs. 56 percent who say they are false.
-70 percent say Trump should testify to Mueller, vs. only 25 percent who say he should not.
-57 percent say Trump knew about contacts between his campaign operatives and Russians, vs. only 36 percent who say he did not.
25 Likes
No matter what happens, he goes back to jail to await his D.C trial.
11 Likes
Closing argument:
If the ostrich jacket doesnāt fit, you must acquit.
17 Likes
Is that the case? If so, that is good newsā¦
Hopefully in tamper-free cellā¦
1 Like
This is reportedly over the 2016 campaign NDA she signed, not the 2020 campaign NDA she refused to sign. (edit: sorry, I see others have already answered this)
3 Likes
Does the NDA say that drump can publicly attack the person non stop with anything he wants but they are still not allowed to say anything negative about him?
2 Likes
Whatever.
From my standpoint it was the issue when i read that no witnesses were called.
2 Likes
Iām not a lawyer, but curious as to how Team Trump can try to apply a campaign NDA to anything Omarosaās written, said, or released that concerns her time at the White House. Even if thereās language in the original NDA stipulating that itās in effect for time immemorial (and Iām sure there is), how can that legally be extended to the White House, where NDAs are almost certainly not legally enforceable?
6 Likes
In what way do any efforts to gag Omarosa not lend credibility to the dirt sheās peddling?
6 Likes
I donāt think it can be enforced but it remains to be seen I guess. I tend to agree with you.
5 Likes
The RNC has no interest in exposing anything Trump related to sunlight. For some reason, theyāre still backing this trainwreck to cross the line first.
7 Likes