Well, there’s a real defender of libertarianism.
We’re doomed
I am shocked. Shocked! That Republicans, the party of Karl Rove, never gave a shit about classified information.
“What’s most important is i want trump to pick someone who agree’s with donald trump”.
That’s paul sucking the donald with one side of his mouth.
To slightly strengthen your theorem we only need to add a plausible assumption that both X and Y are non-negative and that with this assumption the statement of the theorem remains true even if X=0.
He must have unintentionally blurted this information out while under psychological torture of being denied p***y grabbing opportunities.
Agree with Donald Trump? Which Trump? The one that wants to bomb everyone? The one who thinks we should pull out of all the countries we’re in? The one that thinks Saudi Arabia and a host of other countries should get atomic weapons. So many Trumps. So little agreement between them.
HowStuffWorks… Peter Principle… see Trump administration.
“What’s most important is I want Donald Trump to pick someone who agrees with Donald Trump,” so I’ll continue to lie that Hillary ‘shared’ information so people will think Petraeus isn’t ‘that bad’. Yep.
Am I wrong that Petraeus was actually pretty good, he just couldn’t keep his dick in his pants or his mouth shut. Seem like if he could control his urges he might be ok…big question about control though for guys that do this shit.
if “he could control his urges”, He couldn’t then, He can’t now (Anthony Weiner syndrome, I think it is called).
Thanks for the correction.