In Texas, they say if you get cancer and have only a month to live, move to Oklahoma, because your 30 days will feel like an eternity.
This month feels like living in Oklahoma with shingles and only one TV station-- which broadcasts Rachel Ray 24/7.
Hair Furor just claimed that the press âmakes upâ anonymous quotes. Perhaps he should check out his chief of staffâs phone logs.
You just knew Pubis was going to trip on his dick one day. Heâs not that talented to keep all the plates full of lies spinning.
Rinse Penis better be brushing up his resume. And his best â5th Amendmentâ voice for his upcoming trial.
Priebus - âMy unnamed sources are better than your unnamed sourcesâŚâ
Trump: FBI, CIA, Press and our government is the enemy of the people. We should drain that damn swamp. Donât trust a word that comes from our government.
I know, because I am the Preibusâs unnamed source.
So Priebus is saying he broke rules on communication between the whitehouse and investigators.
Reince* thus once again justifies why a bipartisan Special Committee is necessary.
*fixed nefarious spellcheck
They called it obstruction of justice during Nixonâs time. Hope he has a good lawyer.
And her only guests are rejects from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour. You know youâve hit rock bottom when youâre eagerly waiting for the vintage Serutan commercials.
"Serutan. Thatâs âNaturesâ spelled backwards."â˘
That Totalitarian State is a bitch to run, Reince, a few executions may make things go more smoothlyâŚ
I wonder if Bannon pushed Priebus (maybe indirectly) to pressure the FBI in order to get rid of him. (A former Justice Department spokesman is saying that what Priebus did crossed every line and that he should step down.) It was a mind-boggling ham-handed act.
And theyâve assured me that that New York Times story was grossly overstated, and inaccurate and totally wrong.
I would say that âoverstatedâ and âtotally wrongâ are mutually exclusive adjectives. Did the Times exaggerate the extent of contacts or was the story totally wrong and there were no contacts at all? Canât be both.
Interesting point. After all who would know about this to leak it to CNN?
Greg Sargent quotes NBC news saying that the NYT was not correct in saying that it was Russian intelligence officials the Trump campaign was in contact with. Not necessarily wrong but (allegedly) they havenât confirmed it. But there definitely were contacts.
If true, Iâd say âtotally wrongâ is the loser here.
Yes, but youâre talking about a man in a cesspool treading water as fast as he can. He doesnât have time to be concerned with semantic niceties.
Maddow did an excellent segment on this last night, appropriately titled âIs the Tump Administration Stupid or Nefarious?â
The answer, of course, is BOTH.
Exactly. Whether Bannon pushed him to go to FBI in the first place or not, I see the idea that Bannon may have been the one leaking the information is now gaining credence.