Discussion for article #240195
Final paragraph sums up T-Rump perfectly.
I agree with Trumpâs willingness to admit we need to raise taxes on the rich and rich hedge fund managers. Thatâs a big step in the right direction
icymi - This is a pretty good article that pulls a lot of threads together to compare Sanderâs and Trumpâs populism to the populism of the 1892 Peopleâs Party platform.
Populists tend to attribute the existence of large numbers of the idle rich and the idle poor to government corruption. In the words of the 1892 Peopleâs Party platform: âFrom the same prolific womb of governmental injustice we breed the two great classesâtramps and millionaires.â
tRump is âRightâ misleads a bitâŚbecause tRump is not correct, only right as in rightwingnutjob.
His economic derp-ship is somewhat less filled with derp than the other GOP Clown Car occupants?
Does tRump have a lower mud content level than the other golems on the right? Possibly. Is tRump still exactly the ignorant blowhard he seems to be? Absolutely.
nice. iâve been trying to figure out whatâs with ted cruz. not quite a human? clearly a golem!
I often wonder what the best policy for most Americans would look like if Republicans didnât use economic policy exclusively as a way to pander to the rich and Democrats didnât use immigration policy exclusively as a way to pander to Hispanics.
Krugman argued that former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush ÂŽ should be attacking
Trumpâs racist comments rather than going after Trumpâs remarks on
taxes"
Is Krugman saying Trump is the âKing of Taxesâ as Trump has said?
Edit:
Raising taxes on the wealthy is a good idea but it wasnât a Trump original. The idea has been around a long time. In my opinion Trump is the worst candidate for President in my 66 years if existence.
Read the salon.com article @Doremus_Jessup which points out that Trump is not opposed to taxes unlike the rest of the R field.
It may seem odd that populists would choose a bombastic billionaire to express their concerns but it must be noted that unlike any of the rest of the GOP field he has supported tax hikes on the wealthy, gone after hedge funds, and picked a big fight with the Club for Growth
Itâs like the clean spot on an soiled ragâŚitâs too little to make a difference. The more the rubes fall in love tRump, the farther down the rabbit hole theyâll fall. This has been the hallmark of tRumpism: Insanity, wrapped in derp, with a dash of inexplicable reason tossed in for contrast.
Itâs a terrible moment when an economist and others agree with Trump on something because it gives him a little legitimacy and downplays the rest of the ugliness and overall unsuitability for the presidency
Even a stopped clockâŚ
Of course, since Trump is a real estate mogul, and real estate deals typically have huge tax subsidies built in, itâs not that hard for him to say that other rich people should pay higher taxes.
That may be true. I am just giving him credit for saying it and because he knows it to be true.
tRump refuses to echo the clearly wrong GOP mantra on taxes and economy does not mean he is right.
Sure, Iâm following you. Krugman points out that some of tRumps positions are outside the GOP mainstream, and more in keeping with a Democratic platform that conservative. Itâs a distinction that sets tRump apart from the clown car herd. Duly noted. My comment disregarded that as pertinent, but itâs still relevant when sizing up differences in candidates. I acknowledge those facts, but I guess I prefer to largely ignore them.
It may seem odd that populists would choose a bombastic billionaire to express their concerns but it must be noted that unlike any of the rest of the GOP field he has supported tax hikes on the wealthy, gone after hedge funds, and picked a big fight with the Club for Growth.
And although Partonâs analysis seems to be spot-on, I doubt that tRumps base would acknowledge itâŚor would they?
I think Krugmanâs column is inverse condemnation, damning by faint praise, etc. Krugman acknowledges that Trump is a vile racist blowhard. But the main targets, are the rest of the GOP field. Krugman has been constructing this meme for a while: 1] The other GOP candidates are just as outrageous, dishonest and untrustworthy as Trump is. They are just âsmootherâ about it than Trump; and 2] Unlike the rest of the field, Trump is filling a niche by espousing a kind of âeconomic populismâ coupled with almost unapologetic racism and nativism.
Looking back, when the economic populism of, say, William Jennings Bryan was at itâs height in the early part of the twentieth century, the civil rights, [or lack thereof] of blacks as well as immigrants was arguably at its nadir in that century. Itâs been hard to get my head around the idea that âeconomic progressivismâ and racism/sexism/nativism are not mutually exclusive, but Iâm getting there.
Thanks for this.
That is pretty much what Professor Krugman wrote. You put that point in much more entertaining language anyone can understand, I appreciate that. Iâm not sure if he is so much golem or Gollum, though.
Great stuff; love KrugmanâŚ
Paraphrasing: âItâs not that Donald Trump is so right⌠more like, Republicans overall are pretty dumb.â