Discussion: NRA Commentator: You Don't Need To See To Be Able To Fire A Gun

He doesn’t care, he’s saying what the NRA is paying him to say.

1 Like

Right, all you need is some blind rage.

There are no sharks to jump in the NRA gene pool. They will only continue to get crazier and crazier.

Fact is, it’s been proven that people that lack vision have an increased awareness of their hearing and spatial surroundings.

Does he think that the movie Daredevil is a documentary?

1 Like

Of course they back them, I mean the blind have the same aim most of the gun nuts do.

this is an SNL skit right???

I’m just glad the Auto Industry isn’t as completely irresponsible as the Firearms Industry.

Sad thing is that the NRA of the 1970s is responsible for my own firearms training. And they did a good job of it back then, before they went collectively neo-bircher-bugf%&k.

Heading

The NRA guy is full of it. You need to be able to see to safely fire a gun.

Every year I go to a shooting tournament where as a side match they have what they call a night shoot. You shoot at the target light only by moonlight. Everybody shooting is a crack shot. We all miss most of the time.

And as gunfondlers demonstrate on a daily basis - you don’t need a brain, either.

1 Like

Are you SURE this isn’t “The Onion” in disguise?

1 Like

Merci, Je essaie

Raso said the blind would have to follow more strict safety procedures when handling a weapon

Wait a second…isn’t that…big gubbermint regulation?!?

I have always thought the sense of sight is way overrated. Instead I recommend sniffing out the bad guy and firing in that general direction with eyes closed… but then I AM a Lab.

Note that Raso keeps returning to the scenario where the blind person is being raped/beaten/murdered by someone right on top of them. In his fantasies, this is where the blind individual retrieves their gun out of hammerspace and promptly gut-shoots the completely oblivious and undoubtedly dark-skinned perpetrator. Or, if the dark perp is attacking from behind, calmly directs the gun behind themselves–hopefully around the hip rather than next to the face–and blasts out their organs thusly.

The possibility is endless. Let’s train every animal how to shoot. The only way to stop a bad bear, ape or chimp with a gun is with a good bear, ape or chimp with a gun.,

What about the second amendment rights of inanimate objects? Just because they are not live beings with feelings or emotions does not mean they can not shoot a gun as long as they receive assistance from our NRA brethren. Why should killing people without feeling or emotion be limited to sociopaths who buy guns and can kill without feeling. Are we so human centric that we deny animals and inanimate objects their god given second amendment rights?

A door bell with a spring trap that fires off a round or even multiple rounds gives inanimate objects power that our founding fathers.intended but forgot when they wrote the second amendment. Why can’t a well regulated militia consist of inanimate booby traps that fire off rounds randomly at the people who accidentally set off the trigger mechanism. It will teach people to be careful and be eternally vigilant. As we know from Thomas Jefferson, the price of liberty is eternally vigilance. Random traps that spray bullets at the people or animals that set them off will teach everyone eternal vigilance.

No longer will we need nuclear weapons to embrace the doctrine of duck and cover. It is my modest proposal.