Incoming Tweetstorm!
I just really really want to know who is “leaking” these questions to CNN and why.
I did think it interesting that (per the CNN article) “Two of the sources said they do not know from the questions asked whether Mueller has concrete evidence to indicate wrongdoing.”
Did the third source say something different? If so, I didn’t catch that. I’ve been saying all along that Mueller is conducting these interviews very, very carefully. He does not want to show his hand to anyone. Of course.
Please be thorough. Turn over every rock, and investigate what’s underneath—you’ll only get one shot, and only our future as a democracy is at stake.
Truckload delivery to the WH is available!
Van de Hei—not exactly hostile to Rs—admitted on msnbc the other day that all the leaks have come from those being questioned. Mueller’s team doesn’t leak.
Narcissists gonna project.
I can’t remember who it was, but last night someone tweeted that he will testify under oath that in 2011 he saw Trump in the Trump tower office with Trump for President signs and book of information on Iowa, and the Trump said he was going to run in 2016.
He wrote that he will call the SC office.
Trump has been doing business in Russia–or trying to–for a long time. Some of his early associates:
we are months and months and months behind in knowing where Mueller is today. Guess this leak was strategic taunt of the tRump cabal?
I don’t see how this is important at all. We do know Trump was crazy to build a tower in Russia, was over there trying to talk to Putin and every other bigwig with little success, all that. He was probably just doing his usual thing when he wants something, making all kinds of crazy promi–oh.
One witness reportedly told investigators that Trump was resolute about running for president in 2014, according to CNN. Trump himself claims he didn’t know he was running back then.
***POLITICS 01/21/2014 07:00 am ET Updated Mar 23, 2014***
Donald Trump Says He May Run For President In 2016
By Richard Valdmanis
MANCHESTER, New Hampshire (Reuters) - Outspoken real estate magnate Donald Trump said on Tuesday he may seek the Republican presidential nomination for 2016, adding that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s prospects for a White House run have dimmed since a scandal erupted.
A run for the presidency “is something I would certainly look at,” Trump told Reuters. “You know why? I’m unhappy with the way things are going in America.”
Trump gave the telephone interview before making a breakfast speech at the “Politics & Eggs” forum at St. Anselm College in Manchester, New Hampshire - an event that tends to feature presidential hopefuls. Trump did not directly address the idea of a running for office during the speech.
New Hampshire traditionally holds the nation’s first presidential nominating primaries and is a regular stop for White House aspirants.
He told Reuters he was interested in the idea of personally undoing the legacy of President Barack Obama, who he said had made a “big mistake” with the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare, and had done too little to shore up the American economy.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/21/donald-trump-2016_n_4636146.html
<img src="/uploads/default/original/3X/1/d/1d89dbb0c7bc26bf3433eaa7c54d7d7e294ff981.png" width="275" height="183">Mueller drops shovel, switches to backhoe.
Oh I didn’t think they did. I’m just wondering if they wink and nod, since obviously this is bad news for Trump and CNN is not a Trump friendly news source. Is FAUX getting credible “leaks” of any sort? Or is this just all so awful for Trump and Co. that all FAUX can do is lie and spin?
I don’t think Mueller needs to leak stuff, by the way. If he wants to drop little hints to people he puts intriguing language, unnecessary things, provocative omissions etc. into an indictment. He don’t play, Mueller.
Good old Tom Friedman, purveyor of the blindingly obvious.
Trump is volatile, insecure, prone to lash out and act in a rash manner. Long ago he said delving into his finances, especially pre-campaign era issues, was a red line. His lawyers and advisers exercise only so much control over him. It wouldn’t surprise if this type of prying sent him over the edge and precipitated a nasty showdown with Mueller, maybe even his dismissal, prudent actions be damned.
Blindly obvious for some people is barely intelligible for a big hunk of the country. BIG HUNK. Spoon feed them.
And yet…
These “leaks” lead to twitter storms of obstruction, blathering quotes of obstruction, lies, lies, and more lies, and the undeniable sight of this POS POTUS looking desperate and incompetent.
Which helps sell this to the country.
With all this talk about Trump firing Mueller, I believe it is stated in Mueller’s “contract” that he only be fired for a good reason, not because of something like “this Rusher thing with Trump & Rusher”. The question is, what is & who decides what constitutes “a good reason”?