Discussion: MS Abortion Ban Struck Down For Being 'Unequivocally' Unconstitutional

is almost as despicable as an issue which effects women only, namely access to abortion, and very little mention of women themselves as the victims of decisions made by others, e.g. unwanted pregnancies and children. Not just missing in the report, but here as well.

3 Likes

Right-wing rosetta stone:

“I am confused about where the outrage is at — about 20 million African-American children that have been aborted,” Bryant said.

Democrats = Planned Parenthood = Margaret Sanger = eugenics = black genocide.

“No one wants to say anything about that. No one wants to talk about that.”

Those not saying = Media = Democrats = “the plan is to suppress black people by keeping them ‘on the plantation’ of the welfare state”.

Ergo, Democrats are the real racists, and the Republican attempt to control women’s sexuality is evidence of Republicans’ status as the real non-racists.

1 Like

Well, the story does, as does the male judge’s decision. As Eustace says, it’s pretty great.

Here is a link to a LA newspaper, The Advocate, PDF version of the court ruling:

https://www.theadvocate.com/pdf_ee0a3b28-ed0d-11e8-9538-1bcaacdae460.html

How do you figure abortion affects only women? Its not just a medical procedure.

1 Like

YOU tell me how if affects the other gender. Some kind of emotional oh I want a child, won’t you carry it for me so it can be a mini me? No. It’s a medical procedure, not as simple as having tonsils removed, but a medical procedure nonetheless.

Like it or not, fathers are emotionally invested in the pregnancies they caused. Or should be.

2 Likes

He wants Mississippi to be “…the safest place in America for an unborn child.”

Bryant can prove it by setting up free medical clinics for all pregnant women or he can shut his yap.

4 Likes

If they put the same energy (and “prayer”) into actually ending Unwanted Pregnancy (UP) instead of abortion, they’d ultimately get their first wish. End UP and you all but end abortion.

To me, abortion is nothing more than a symptom of UP. Advocating for “abstinence” is fine, but you can’t draw the line there. That doesn’t end UP. It can only (arguably) reduce it. So long as UP exists, so will abortion, legal or otherwise. The historical horrors of that prohibition are well-remembered. We must never go back there.

So to all those people that block ways of ending UP while fighting to end abortion, I say, “you can’t have it both ways” without also giving up ALL of our liberties and freedoms and becoming a fascist, authoritarian state.

Good job to the courts for standing with the Constitution against the “Marriage of Church and State” people…

1 Like

Financial support and medical care for the rearing of the child as well, so no one is in the position of being unable to afford a child …

As long as we’re dreaming. Pro-life my big toe.

1 Like

Actually, in about 90% of cases, it’s a zygote that has been removed, not a fetus and certainly not a “child”.

And yet they argue against “birth control” and “family planning”. I submit that they just identified 20 million reasons to end Unwanted Pregnancy (and no, abstinence isn’t a “cure”, and religion doesn’t get to dictate the terms). End Unwanted Pregnancy, and you all but end abortion by default.

Pro-lifers need to stop being so short-sighted. If they really cared about improving the conditions of human life, they’d be fighting tooth and nail for preventative care.

2 Likes

Are you quite sure?

2 Likes

It takes a special kind of person to love the zygote so much more than the person carrying it or the end product of the pregnancy. Bryant mourning African-American fetuses is like a wolf mourning unborn sheep. It just doesn’t ring true.

2 Likes

Their presumed emotional investment takes a back seat to a mom who is doing the majority of work around that child or two or three and the toll childbirth takes on her body and the risk of dying in childbirth. It still happens.

These men are in power large due to a majority of white women voting for them.

2 Likes

No one voted for any SCOTUS Justice whose decisions will likely be the final arbiter of what women can do with their bodies. The anti abortion forces won’t stop until this happens.

1 Like

It’s comical when the reasoning behind such restrictive abortion laws is “to protect women’ s health”. Correction: it would be comical if it were not, in reality, so dangerous to women’ s health.
(why does auto-correct insist that the apostrophe must be before the “s”?!?!? auto-incorrect!)

Except, of course, that ending unwanted pregnancies, in many parts of this country, means ending the access to young girls that male predators think is a right…

1 Like

how dare women think they should have any say so, when health-care decisions, concerning their own bodies, need to be made?! don’t they realize that those decisions are best left to white/evangelical/christian men, the only people with the knowledge/insight, necessary to make those difficult decisions, in a rational, emotionless way? if you let them start deciding whether/how many children to have, where will it end? next, they’ll be wanting to vote/go to college/work outside the home/not get married/be able to support themselves/etc.

it will be the end of modern civilization as we know it. besides which, who’ll make me a sammich?

1 Like

Trend lines for maternal deaths.

Mississippi is about mid- rank at 20.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births

while California is best at 4 per 100,000.

What is odd is that Mississippi is 2nd worst in harm to maternal health but mid- rank in maternal death.

1 Like