You can add the NYT into your list of rags falling for the Barr letter as being the actual conclusions. The NYT will do basically any ass kissing to make itself appear to be “in the middle” no lie is too great to peddle in their effort to do “both-siderism” journalism.
To be fair, it’s the only sort of faith they have to react with.
“If we do not get this right, if we do not hold these people accountable, I promise you, with all the love I can muster for this country and our future for our kids and grandkids, we will lose the greatest country God has ever given man,”
Not sure why this is news or even worth re-reporting. This is like the glee they display when it snows as proof the atmosphere isn’t warming. Let’s turn to other components of the death of Western Democracy.
going to be funny in the future when the report comes out.
Expect bigly gasps and ohhhh and ahhhhhs
shocked they will say.
going to be funny.
Then we can all call for fox news to be investigated for colluding with the trump mob.
Throw in accessories to the facts of crimes against the country while there at it…
Slam Dunk should the order of that day.
Lord, if it wasn’t for bad faith, I wouldn’t have no faith at all.
“Steve Bannon approached the issue with his signature brand of hyperbole and schizophrenic-guy-on-the-subway racism, telling the AP that the Mueller probe had set back efforts to link the Judeo-Christian West against China.”
I am so gonna dance in the streets when this guy finally chokes to death on his own vodka-laced vomit.
In the past 30 years, the NY Times has
a) been the leader in the anti-Clinton Whitewater nonsense, publishing story after story passing on whatever baseless charge or insinuation Republicans were making
b) gave Judith Miller front-page space to pass on lies about WMDs in Iraq in order to help Bush start a war there
c) spent two years publishing numerous vacuous stories about Hillary Clinton emails, usually on the front page, and always slanted against her
d) published a story one week before the election in 2016 declaring that the FBI investigation had found no ties between Trump and Russia.
The NY Times is not on our side. I think that, as an entity, it’s difficult to assign a single motive to everything the Times does, as so many people are involved. But somebody there who is very powerful is quite willing to pass on propaganda to help Republicans when they really need it.
The entire Mueller report so far for the Dems has been the political equivalent of letting OJ try on the gloves.
Gee if you are not an obsessed lib out to get Trump then you are obsessed conservative out to protect Trump.
Man, you are so wrong.
He drinks Bourbon.
Conservatives are big talkers until they’re called on their crap.
And if the news is bad, they block its release. Sorta like what’s happening with the Mueller report.
Which just raises questions of why it’s not being released, which defeats the purpose
Curious - anyone know what Chuck Lorre did to get on the Mueller bracket image? Every other item in the image made sense to me.
Per GOP acting bad faith - they have been doing that at least since I was old enough to vote (Reagan).
If they didn’t have bad faith, they’d have no faith at all
h/t: Ray Charles
Y’know, for all this talk about the report not being released, I have two words: Pentagon. Papers. They were not supposed to be released to the public, either. I know they will shilly-shally and delay it, but I am of the considered opinion that the report will eventually be released. Let the cons enjoy a few moments of dancing in the streets; it won’t last forever.
Sounds an awful lot like a conspiracy to take down American democracy and install a Trump/extreme right-wing dictatorship in America.