Discussion: Judge Agrees To Pause Financial Record Subpoenas While Trump Appeals

How long will it takes for an appeals court judge to decide if they’ll take this case?

5 Likes

The judge said that Trump and his family “are unlikely to succeed on merits of their claims.”

How can they so shamelessly bring up the “family” claim when most of the family members mess with politics?

9 Likes

The sunlight eventually shining on his criminality is going to burn.

14 Likes

I’m with Justin:

IMPEACH

6 Likes

Third Grader: Mommy, help me study for my spelling test!

Mom: What’s the magic word?

TG: Oh yeah. Mommy, please?

Mom: Please what?

TG: Help me study for my spelling test, please! (sigh)

Mom: Okay. (Looks list over.) Let’s start with an easy one. Spell shameless.

TG: T-R-U-M-P

7 Likes

So Ramos is afraid of Trump.

Me thinks he got a call from Bob Mueller and told him he better back off or he’ll sick Bill Barr on him.

3 Likes

It isn’t surprising that someone finally agreed to pause the subpoenas. In a way, it seems reasonable so that they can’t argue that they have been mistreated in the process (although they still will). They can’t be happy with his observation that they are unlikely to succeed on the merits" of the claim, however. That’s going to leave a mark.

12 Likes

In subpoena enforcement cases (I handled a number of these for the government) the Court of Appeals will ordinarily expedite the appeal. I expect that the cases (DC and NY) will be fully briefed by August and argued in either a special August session or at the start of the ordinary September session, with decisions rendered within a month.

Then it gets interesting. If Trump loses (likely) he will ask to Supreme Court for a stay pending his application for certiorari. One possibility is that the Court turns the petition down promptly, in which case production would occur in the fall.

But if the Court takes the cases for review (again, I think this likely) it will be argued in January at the earliest (more likely in February or March) and the decision will probably come at the end of the term in late June 2020. So production will occur just as the Presidential campaign goes into high gear.

This could become the all-time political circus if the information provided contains proverbial smoking guns which the Democrats believe they must make public.

22 Likes

Really? That’s five kinds of weird.

8 Likes

Courts can act pretty quickly when they want to or when there’s external pressure – both of which would I think apply in this case. (Think days or weeks, not months.) You need time to brief, but the issues here are pretty straightforward. It would, to me, I think say more about the court if it didn’t act quickly in this case.

ETA: I spaced, thinking SCOTUS not appeals court. It’s not a discretionary appeal, i.e. the court has to take the appeal. Given that, think in terms of maybe a month or two to a hearing on the short side.

8 Likes

Do bone spurs ever go away? Can Trump prove he had them?
I want to see the X-rays.
If they were real, were they removed?
If not, they should still be there to prove.
If they WERE removed, I want to see the paperwork.

6 Likes

“Today, as you probably don’t know, ‘cause the lyin’ media…they’re liars, right? The lyin’ media won’t tell you, that we won a GREAT LEGAL VICTORY. The judge…an Obama judge from Poo-air-toe Rico…and we love Poo-air-toe Rico…and they should love me after I gave them 91 billion dollars…says we’re TOTALLY VINDICATED…NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION! But even he knows I DID NOTHING WRONG! Of course now he won’t get invited to all the fancy Dem dinners with Cryin’ Chuck and Unstable Nancy…she’s changed, don’t you think? But that’s OK, right? But they’re not going to tell you that at the lyin’ looser New York Times.”

“Ahhh, Mr. President, this is only a temporary stay while we prepare an appeal.”

“Get me Barr on the phone right now. What the fuck did I hire him for? Don’t those guys work for him and doesn’t he work for me? This ends now or just wait and see what happens!”

6 Likes

Exactly. So why put it off?

1 Like

No reason for the House to agree to this. More slow-walking.

And Nancy Delay still hasn’t scheduled a vote on the Billy Barr Contempt Motion passed by the House Judiciary Committee three weeks ago!

And let’s not forget that the Mueller report was issued on March 23d.

No report.

No tax returns.

No financial records.

Just slow-walking.

5 Likes

IKR? Sheez.

‘Sigh’. Another ‘mother may I’ approach from the Dems instead of taking ownership of the process. Hold folks in contempt. Send some big names to jail and you’ll get everything you want. Play in the political arena, not just the legal one.

17 Likes

If this is the correct timeline, why is everyone in the media calling it the “Run Out The Clock” Strategy? Sounds like really bad timing for Trump if everything is released in the thick of the presidential campaign. Right? Or am I missing something here?

8 Likes

It’s not just that the family messes with politics, it’s that doing transactions in the name of the kids is a standard dodge for tax avoidance and tax evasion, as well as for money laundering. Remember how Mitt Romney undervalued a “gift” he gave his sons by a few tens of millions of dollars to avoid taxes. Or how in the previous generation Fred Trump ran a bunch of transactions with questionable values through his offspring to avoid taxes…

5 Likes

To Democratic leadership, what’s far more horrifying and disturbing than brazen lawlessness by Trump is Democrats appearing partisan.

4 Likes