In other words, they were thorough.
There are too many similarities between Trump and Sanders for my taste. Whining when things donāt go their way is one of them.
OK, letās get this out of the way: Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
But seriously, what is this, Tee-ball? Either you can answer the question or you canāt. Heās applying for a fairly high-pressure job.
Really! How can a president be expected to answer questions from reporters?
Since we canāt comment on the editorās blog hereās my comment on the āIām voting for Bernie but on one conditionāā¦
What a bunch of hog wash! If you really want Hillary to win, then freaking VOTE for her! If not, then donāt, but spare us the BS. I mean, really!
An inquisition is spending 11 hours being grilled by a Congressional panel created solely for the purpose of destroying your career and the legacy of the president you served and/or potentially finding evidence of a crime that will lead to you and/or the presidentās imprisonment. Willingly submitting yourself to a couple hours of questions by a few reporters in a board room in NYC is no such thing. Have a seat, please.
āJane Sanders Says Husbandās NY Daily News Interview Was Like An Inquisition.ā
Are you, by any chance, familiar with the concept of the modern Presidency?
I wanted to comment there, too. (Itās not even Josh, who has the right to avoid comments, I guess.) And while I agree with your analysis, at least Iāll give the guy credit for really thinking about what his vote means, and somehow voting against the GOP candidate.
Not only does he want Hillary to win, he doesnāt think Bernie would be an especially good candidate or President. And thatās really kind of the key question the primary is meant to answer.
I like none of his pieces published on the front thus far.
Sanders is a grumpy old fart, who happens to be running against a supremely qualified, but charisma-challenged politician. Iām grateful he has made campaign finance a major topic of discussion. But other than that, he doesnāt impress me at all.
I saw Jane Sanders interviewed the other day. She has always impressed me as smart, articulate, and not particularly desirous of focusing attention on herself. However, she did more of that āwhiningā in the interview I saw, too. It just doesnāt come off well.
Ok, admittedly I donāt like Bernie, but honestly I thought the interview was really good because all the right questions got asked and I didnāt think it was in any way unfair - except insofar as Bernie was unfair to himself.
The only problem with Hillary in that kind of interview is that sheās like Bill - she will explain in detail forever.
If Bill whined baselessly like this The Bern would whine incessantly about Billās whining.
But of course spouses are off limits unless the name starts with āBā and ends with āillā
Heās kinda like TPMās version of Ross Douthat.
There it is. Took a little longer than I thought it would, but desperation has finally bubbled over. Donāt they realize that this line of attack has a very rethug smell to it? Trumpā¦ the Wasillabillyā¦ now Sanders?!?
Yeah, thatās an apt description.
Thanks, I wanted to comment on it. I mean -what logic is there in voting for someone you donāt want to win?
People have lost their damn minds - they think their vote will be seen like a written essay exam and theyāll get points somehow.
Or something - like votes in a primary make anyone think - O yes, this must have been a vote for universal single payer health care. Letās see the next ballotā¦