Nope, also missing icons.
Wendy Murdoch, ex-wife of Rupert and girlfriend of Vladimir (at the time).
As Penny would say: O sweetie.
Thatās a smokescreen comment. It makes the conversation about something Clinton did, legally, and something she claims she did not do and takes the conversation away from using a private device to communicate officially which they both did. ādeletionsā and āarchivingā are obfuscations. If you and I both robbed banks last month the fact that I used a shotgun and you used a 9mm isnāt relevant. But you could spin the conversation to one of āIāve never owned a shotgunā and thatās what Ivanakās doing. After being coached to do soā¦
āAll of my emails are stored and preserved. There were no deletions. There is no attempt to hide."
bookmarking
Thatās who it was!! Thank you!!
I think she thinks sheās a clever girl. The emails are āstoredā where? On a government server? because thatās where they must be stored not a private phone. And how do you āstoreā a phone call? Sheās full of shit.
I started seeing the squares on Chrome last weekend. I switched to Firefox (had to re-install, so itās a new version) and still saw only little squares. Switched to Edge and saw all the proper icons. So I think itās browser-dependent.
But I hate Edge so Iām using Chrome and making guesses about which icons are which. Surely theyāll fix this soon ⦠?
Itās been like this since the weekend. Iām on Firefox. Tried Safari and it was worse for me. I just have been using the mouse to find the functions.
So we can use a FOIA request to get all the emails from that account, not just the ones you claim are government-related, right?
Yeah, I am using Chrome too.
Just for fun, I checked in on Internet Explorer (this is a work laptop, so they have loaded several browsers). The icons are okay with IE.
So, itās gotta be browser-related. Now, what I found interesting is @coimmigrant reported not having icons on a Mac (presumably Safari as browser? ā but maybe not?) while I have no problems on my Apple mobile devices. ETA: I see @tena had Safari problems, but again, Safari on my mobile devices shows icons.
At any rate, itās definitely some compatibility issue.
If you open Tools>Web Developer>Web Console in Firefox you can see it says āCross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://dr35ey0x3otoq.cloudfront.net/assets/discourse/fontawesome-webfont-499d35fc70e20cad9e75589ab05377c3.woff?https://forums.talkingpointsmemo.com&2&v=4.4.0. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed).ā Most remote requests are blocked (to avoid malware), with exceptions for things like fonts and icons. Thereās some security setting wrong somewhere thatās causing them not to load. Since it seems to have started at the same time on multiple browsers and OSes, itās presumably on their end.
When I first encountered the problem, I looked at the source code on one of the objects and saw errors flagged in the code. Iām thinking the issue should not be hard to pinpoint, but often there are difficulties making an update compatible with all browsers.
So some of us will just have to wait.
ETA: seems to be a font recognition problem. No access to the appropriate font.
Yeah, I can live with it until they get it fixed.
I did wonder if they did some upgrade and it hasnāt worked for all platforms. Iām on a Mac with a newer version of Safari and so far havenāt had the annoying problem lots of other have. Iām assuming TPM has been contacted.
So, some combination of OS and browser.
Somebody somewhere thought, oh, yeah, just one little tweak.
Been there, done that, suffered the consequencesā¦
Yep. Iām in complete sympathy with the coders sweating it out right now.
The tech world variation on the law of unintended consequences. Takes me back to my days of programming in Fortran IV on punch cards.
I have icons at home on my MacBook (OSX Mojave, Chrome browser). I donāt have icons in the office (Lenovo, Windows 10, Chrome browser).
I remember those days, and the completely cryptic FORTRAN run-time error messages ā¦
I understand your concern but I donāt think you understand mine. Failing to address the rightwing claim that Clinton was deleting emails that may potentially have had things of interest in them (and itās hard to prove the negative here) is allowing that RW spin to go unchallenged. This is not a case of either-or, as you seem to think, but of both-and.