I’d like to see some industrious journalist ask her how she feels about Sequestration.
The rest of the country seems to have forgotten we’re all still operating and funding our federal gov’t within this ridiculous, self-inflicted, unnecessay and totally manufactured restriction via Rethuglican insistence from within her own party. Let her complain about anything to do with funding the federal gov’t and then ask this woman how she can square that with this boneheaded idea of Sequestration. I seriously doubt her nor anyone in her lousy party can answer that one with a straight face since it does not compute.
I think that some GOPers have no idea whatever what a dictator is. They need to read some European history from the early to mid-20th century when dictators were well represented and the effects of them existing was everywhere in the form of millions of innocent people dead in gas chambers, ruined bombed out cities, and great battles fought between huge armies. Obama is not in any way a dictator.
Is it possible that GOPers will still try to impeach Obama even after 2016? And would it be because they just do not understand how our system of government operates? Can it be true?
Yes, “czar” is a media buzzword and shortcut. Most of the so-called “czars” are special assistants to the President and as such, like the President’s National Security Advisor, do not require Senate approval. This causes the Republicans in the Senate and in general to get their knickers in a bunch and claim that the President is “bypassing the Senate” and “undermining the Constitution”. However, such special assistants to the President have little or no statutory regulatory authority and simply advise the President and coordinate policy among the various departments of the Executive Branch within their areas of comptence.
So the “czars” is just yet another non-issue used by Republicans to gin up outrage among the illiterati.
Bruce Braley and his staff must be somewhere twerking their asses off. I’m sorry, but you don’t go spouting this kind of crazy shit in a relatively sane state like Iowa, a state the president won twice, and the state where his primary win made millions of people truly believe that anything was possible. Nah, that state isn’t going to let your crazy, castrating ass take that away from them by electing Senator Impeach-A-Negro.
There were good reasons to impeach both Cheney and Bush, but it was never going to happen, and there certainly would never have been convictions.
Impeachment is an anachronism from a time before one party was taken over by fanatical theocratic authoritarians. Now the Dems will never impeach a Republican president because it’s futile, and Republicans will always impeach a Democratic president because they’re infantile.
Republicans have a precise meaning in mind when they use the word “dictator.” A dictator is any president with a D after his name. (See? D for dictator. So easy even a Tea Partier can understand it.)
Sort of like their personal version of “Unconstitutional” which simply means anything they personally don’t agree with. That seems to coincide with their definition of “tyranny” as well.
This dimwitted, corn sucking, moron should concern herself with her race for the Senate and less time worrying about the President who is NOT A DICTATOR! He was elected by those of us who aren’t stupid enough to vote for ANY Republican. As for her party, they should all stop with the impeachment noise since we all know they don’t have the balls or the grounds to do so! I’ve never seen a party so bitter at the two ass whuppins they took from the President. It’s kind of funny. What they should know are 2 things, first, everytime they whine about this President it makes us Liberals smile becaue we know just how batshit angry he makes them just by being the President, and second, if they ever grow the stones to try and impeach him, they’ll be out of politics even faster than we all thought. Stupid hayseeds!