Yes, and it makes me happy., As @tena would say, we’re the majority and we’re not going back.
4 Likes
Well, if Drumpfie and his Family Mafia keep adding fuel to the fire as they have in the past couple of weeks, I think the flames of outrage will burn hot for a long, long time.
6 Likes
Good times!
1 Like
From the article:
“. . . sell more than 3 million acres of public land back to the states.”
Once again, the public land that Chaffetz hopes to transfer to the extraction industries NEVER belonged to the states.
11 Likes
Worse yet, when he called Mike Flynn at 3 AM to ask him about the dollar and what “rising or falling currency means for the the US economy”, Flynn didn’t fucking know himself!
It really is a case of the blind leading the blind.
We are so screwed…
15 Likes
I wonder if Chaffetz is going to be worried just about being attacked on the right. This has to give him something to think about. Imagine having to do the bidding of these constituents, right wing funders and the tea party all at the same time. He might want to consider a job in lobbying.
7 Likes
Chaffetz: This is all incited by Hillary and Obama. Obama left country in a terrible shape with too many people having access to Health Care.
3 Likes
Or " No patty-fingers, if you please. The proprieties at all times." (The Quiet Man).
1 Like
That would be so awesome. I’ll bet he has great name recognition.
4 Likes
U.S. Rep. Martha McSally said she would not be attending a grass-roots group’s town-hall meeting planned for later this month, describing the gathering as a “political ambush.”
During a telephone call with constituents, the two-term Republican congresswoman who represents District 2 said activists — primarily Democrats — want an opportunity to verbally berate members of Congress in a public setting.
“(The forum) is about trapping people in a political ambush for political theater,” she said, shortly after her local office was presented a petition with more than 1,000 signatures asking her to hold a public meeting.
But, she was in the military. So what?
9 Likes
I truly cannot believe this is a law. Why? Why? (rhetorical, just expressing my bewilderment)The POTUS should be held to the highest standard and that means conflict of interests should absolutely apply to him. I’m baffled that such an irresponsible law would be put in place
3 Likes
Yes they should. Because the dragon’s only going to get hungrier and angrier.
6 Likes
Best video I’ve watched in a while. Smug Jason actually looked scared. I hope he remains scared.
5 Likes
He’s a lawmaker. Change the law.
1 Like
4 Likes
You’re very welcome. And I completely agree about the beginning of Watergate feel to it. It seems certain that some people–including, I assume, the intelligence agencies–know a lot more than they are letting on. That Flynn discussed lifting the sanctions with the Russians, e.g., was known since the end of December (his call was monitored by intelligence–it didn’t take any great sleuth work to catch him) but only came out now.
My initial question though is what the reaction of the Trump regime is going to be. Are they going to try to get away with not firing this guy?
11 Likes
Trial opens over armed 2014 standoff at Bundy ranch in Nevada
By John L. Smith | LAS VEGAS
Thu Feb 9, 2017
Six men accused of taking part in a standoff at the Nevada property of rancher Cliven Bundy aimed rifles at law enforcement during the confrontation, prosecutors said on Thursday during opening remarks in the first of three trials stemming from the land-rights dispute.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nevada-bundy-trial-idUSKBN15O18P
3 Likes
visionary? Oy…
More like Drumpf’s Svengali…
Yup and now between the Women’s March, the spontaneous protests against the ban, and the successes of GrabYourWallet, the dragon has tasted blood and will go for more.
They don’t scare us any more.
8 Likes
Absolutely agree.
I don’t think anyone ever dreamed of the current clusterfuck we find ourselves in.
4 Likes