âFrom the standpoint of where these matters are best investigated, I donât think itâs in Congress right now,â Gowdy said SundayâŚ
ââŚbecause Paul Ryan let one of Trumpâs stooges run the show and I didnât say anything about it.â
Sure, try to have it both ways, you two-faced little traitor. But you almost canât blame him, because the face he was born with is indelibly expressive of the junkyard rat he is inside.
I donât know if I want to laugh at the underbussing, applaud the skillful dagger work or spit in disgust at the shameful hypocrisy.
âFrom the standpoint of where these matters are best investigated, I donât think itâs in Congress right now,â Gowdy said Sunday,
Iâm quite confident that Gowdy thought the GOP controlled Congress was the ultimate tool to conduct thorough, in depth investigations that produced infallible conclusions on the operations of a Democratic administration. Funny how things change so quickly.
No sh*t Sherlock.
We are all awaiting the investigation.
Seems like a classic âall of the aboveâ situation.
If anyone knows how fucked up Republican Congressional investigations can be, itâs this guy.
Translation: Devin is a useless baby clown.
Thanks, California. Good job.
Wow, I must be dreaming. Gowdy said something that was not only reasonable, but that I actually agree with. It almost makes we wonder if he has a sense that the Mueller report is going to be full of so much information of a negative kind that he just doesnât want to be embarrassed by putting himself too squarely on the other side.
I agree. We can all see where this is headed and only a complete asshat, like Nunes, would tie themselves to the railroad tracks to help someone who really doesnât give a damn about him or his Party.
Gowdy is a partisan attack dog occasionally masquerading as a smart tough prosecutor. He knows enough to leave Congress, and he knows he had better temper his image for his future employment.
The good part of this is that I donât think he would hedge this much if he did not know that there was even more damaging and definitive evidence yet to emerge.
He probably was comparing the intensity of the investigation of Clinton with the investigation of Trump and is actually drawing an accurate comparison. (i.e., they didnât really investigate Trump)
is âunderbussingâ your invention? If so, I want to steal it, please.
Who is this guy, and what has he done with Trey Gowdy?
There is not enough soap in all of procter and gambleâs warehouses to clean goudyâs hands. But heâs trying.
As far as I know it may be. First time I remember using it was back during Bridgegate. (Back when I thought Chris Christieâs pattern of bullying and inflicting harm on constituents was an acceptable way to punish political opponents rendered him uniquely unfit for the presidency).
Please do. Everyone should have a legacy of some kind.
Deep inside of Gowdyâs character, he knows this potus is CROOKED to the core!!!
âExecutive branch investigations are just better than congressional ones."
Especially when the congressional ones are conducted in the most absolute bad faith. E.g., Trey Gowdyâs never ending Benghazi Hearings, e.g., the so called Operation Fast and Furious hearings, e.g., The Devin Nunes, Bob Goodlatte, Trey Gowdy whitewash and cover up investigation of Russian Intelligence Collusion with the GOP and Trump campaign.
Since Nunes has had a close relationship with Michael Flynn for several years and has also served on the Trump transition team, he probably thought that having his committee release a report that essentially says âNothing to see here. Move alongâ was a good idea.