Discussion: House GOPer: Move To Another State If You Have A Pre-Existing Condition

4 Likes

At least he’s honest about it!

8 Likes

He’s not for Jeffersonian Democracy, he’s for Jefferson Davis Democracy.

65 Likes

…and here you have it. ‘Move to another state’ if you don’t like the repressive sht we’re pulling. ‘NO we won’t give that state anything extra…it’s probably got sanctuary cities there! NOW let me tell you about GOD and religion and the godless democrats that are trying to screw you over!’…oh yeah we’re on to you you dirty ol’ bastid fraud.

24 Likes

Why doesn’t he move to another state or country? Perhaps Siberia?

17 Likes

This guy is not out of the range of a 2018 Blue Wave. This will not help him.

	Republican	Robert Pittenger Incumbent	58.2%	193,452
	Democratic	Christian Cano	41.8%	139,041

  Total Votes	332,493

  Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections
33 Likes

have the Republicans thought this through??? (no, just kidding. Republicans and thought don’t belong in the same sentence) Because their ideology is that there basically is no national policy but everything is left to the states AND then, RW states implement hateful, mean-spirited policies while holding the door for their best, brightest, etc. to move elsewhere. And they do, taking economic growth, innovation, quality of life, anything attractive with them. And you know what else happens when you lose population??? loss of congressional seats. YAY!

25 Likes

Depraved shitstain doesn’t actually know what “federalism” is.

Federalism, from a constitutional law standpoint, refers to the conferral of certain powers exclusively upon the states and certain powers solely upon the federal government which acts as one of the checks and balances that seemed like a good idea at the time in 1787 and which–to the extent they still teach civics at all–kids are still taught to revere as a categorical good.

When Congress devolves power onto the states over how to spend federal dollars, that isn’t an integral part of the way the Constitution works or even a Constitutionally important matter. Its not a thing that used to happen much before the New Deal (the land grant colleges being a notable exception). Sometimes, that kind of devolution it’s just a good idea because legislation falls into a shared sphere, as with the Interstate highway system. Most of the time, however, it’s the sign of a political cop out, a compromise to get the law passed over regionalistic objections, or, most often, a way for Republicans to hide draconian cuts to a federal program using the magic words “block grant.”

38 Likes

Pittinger apparently didn’t get the memo from Raleigh … “ixnay on the 'brain-drainay” :stuck_out_tongue:

8 Likes

The 2018 mid-terms are going to be one hell of a doozy.

@canary02 It’s their strategy: make more and more states living hellholes to drive out all the liberals/progressives so they can dominate the EC.

8 Likes

Messengers like this make our job so much easier.

5 Likes

Another GOP(Racist-AL): No need to move, just live “Good” as defined by Amerikan Jesus:

10 Likes

“Fast and pray” is a lovely prescription, but I’ve no doubt he wouldn’t dare suggest Donnie skip a meal.

3 Likes

Trump: You can just move to other Red states like TX and FL and die painfully.

3 Likes

Move to another state

Actually, you may not be able to do even that. I don’t know if this bill still includes doing away with state lines (or whatever they called it), but back during round one I recall experts saying that this could backfire by causing insurance companies to all run to the state with the least amount of restrictions. So, you may live in NY with protections set up by the state, but tough shit for you because the only place you can buy insurance is out of bumfuck Alabama and there ain’t no rules down here.

19 Likes

The NC GOP platform could scare off the best and the brightest, the potential Stephen Hawking with a health problem or perhaps someone in a sexual minority who could contribute invaluably. Of course, none of these Republicans are bright enough themselves to grasp something so elemental.

4 Likes

Not exactly. The American people as a whole are in favor of Obamacare. He’s trying to pretend he is doing something democratic by blocking them.

4 Likes

Nonsense. That’s precisely the problem the Republicans in the General Assembly have set about trying to fix. North Carolina has been on the winning side of a regional brain drain for about six decades. People like William Friday and Terry Sandford were no longer satisfied with merely sucking anyone with a brain out of South Carolina and, instead, set about creating a world-class university system, upgrading infrastructure, promote high tech industry, and generally going about trying to attract a bunch of smarty-smarty pants librrul yankee college types from all over the place and just about ruined the place. And oh hell, don’t even get us started on Those People.

But with the assistance of the Koch Brothers, our General Assembly has been about its noble work of turning the state into a thing it never was but that they imagine it to once have been: Mississippi. Attacks on the University of North Carolina, vote suppression, budget cuts, Massive Resistance to Obamacare, tax cuts for rich people, laws to afflict Teh Gays (and whatever), anything they can think of to make the state stupider, meaner, poorer, and less welcoming to people from up north who don’t even engage in ostentatious displays of pre-meal praying in restaurants.

39 Likes

This is clear evidence to me that the proposal is unconstitutional because it creates un-equal protection under the law regarding a federal program. If a citizen lucky to live or be born in one state can have his pre-existing healthcare condition cared for but that citizen’s cousin living in another state cannot - and it is solely because of the venality of the second state’s legislature - doesn’t that meet the definition of unequal protection, a violation of the Constitution?

8 Likes

“People can go to the state that they want to live in,” Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-NC) told reporters Tuesday morning when asked if people with pre-existing conditions could be charged much more under the American Health Care Act.

And there it is.

12 Likes