do you remember when : When Millions Of Lost Bush White House Emails (From Private Accounts) Triggered A Media Shrug The emails had been run through private accounts controlled by the Republican National Committee.
The light and attention sucking Trumpian collapse of the political-media continuum has not yet impacted all unobserved, pre-collapse debris like Ed Henry.
HRCâs mistake is assuming rocky cosmic debris like Henry is hunting fact. She should just say, âYouâre the reporter, Ed.â And, she should have climbed all over the trifling boob for his suggestion that she has the necessary IT skills, a statement that preceded HRCâs âI donât know how it works digitally at allâ but unreported in this posted story.
You mean besides Colin Powell? Or the Rove issue where he had the entire White House using non governmental emails to illegally conduct campaign and political business?
That is nothing but pure smear. A âfriendâ, that cannot be verified by anyone, is telling you that she heard from other people, who cannot be verified by anyone, that there is a serious issue here. What the issue is, cannot only not be verified, it canât even be identified.
So if you personally donât think there is anything there, why drop that paragraph into the mix?
âbetter come cleanâ/ what does that mean, they have the server they are âinvestigatingâ not enough for you maybe be can give her an ultrasound? lol
More guilt by insinuation. So letâs be clear on the actual situationâŚthere was no leaking of classified information involved here. There are no emails that were sent to Hillary that were on this server that were at that time, classified. There are several emails that intelligence wants to classify now so they wonât be released by State as part of FOIA requests, which is fairly typical protocol, and even more typical inter departmental fighting.
I dunno. Itâs not even close enough to get me to not vote for her, but it IS troubling. I think the FOIA is a precious thing. Guess Iâm a hand-wringer.
There are actually NIST standards for media sanitization. Hopefully the system administrator took it upon themselves to decide how best to secure the server once it was out of their control but Iâd bet there was some conversation about the issue with the Clintons.
NahâŚonly wealthy white men are allowed to go there. Sheâll just be giving the MSM the excuse it is looking for to paint her as an uppity shrieking harpy ice queen who thinks herself better than everyone else, feels she is entitled to be POTUS and refuses to answer questions. They want nothing more than to close the gap in this race, which is why this crippled nontroversy still manages to walk around in the first place.
When GOPers do itâŚor say shit like Huckabee said, etcâŚthe MSM has to play along nice because they donât want to lose access to them. Access = ratings = ad revenue.
What am I insinuating? And has the investigation been completed? I believe itâs still ongoing because they havenât even completed examining her server.
I donât believe anything untoward was done but no one knows for sure, yet. And yes, I understand the classification aspect of whatâs going on.
Regarding the lost Bush White House emails, Hillary Clinton said that the previous administration was shredding the Constitution. It seems very hypocritical to give speeches criticizing the Bush administration for something and then going out and doing the same thing.
The scariest part of this story is that Clinton didnât seem to grasp that her private server setup was extremely vulnerable. All her emails travelled from the State Department network over the internet to her server, then back over the internet again to her mobile devices. From what experts are saying, it is a near certainty that at least some of her emails are now in the hands of foreign governments and others. Perhaps even Julian Assange at Wikileaks.
Once Hillary decided to use her own email system, she essentially took on full responsibility for keeping her email safe. If it turns out that her email was compromised, I donât see how she could possible win the general election.
You have been duped, willpower. Just by thinking there is something to âcome cleanâ about, you have been led to a falsehood. This is a classic Fox/political maneuverâraise a provocative falsehood, then point to the ensuing discussion of the falsehood as proof that something significant must be happening.
That classified info was leaked. You are doing so repeatedly, and without any basis in fact, merely an unverifiable source telling you an unverifiable story.
And, you are being so incredibly heavy handed about it, that the âwhat, me?â charade of asking what you are insinuating doesnât even come close to believable.
Well, someone somewhere used the words âcriminal investigationâ (it might have been the New York Times before they totally reversed themselves, but anyway) and it somehow involves a person with the surname Clinton. SoâSCANDAL!!!