Discussion for article #232365
In other words, help me confuse and befuddle the issue.
I thought the Hyde amendment also provided an exception for the health of the mother. Any help?
Seriously, itâs called âProLifeCon?â It is a con alright. The Republicans do not want this issue to go away. How else will they gin up the base?
One more clueless insensitive man talking about issues he should not. He and the rest regard it as a talking point that needs to be honed for wingnut consumption, when at bottom itâs a medical procedure preceded by agonizing decision making all involving no one but women. I hate these guys.
They should bring in Todd Akin to sort this out. I seem to recall that he was an expert in this field.
âItâs like, you know, I guess I just donât understand why weâre having such a hard time defining what rape is, considering how much time and effort weâve put into telling everyone that rape never even happens. Like, why should anyone at all be confused about the definition of rape when weâve put so many man-hours into telling everyone on every media outlet that every single reported instance of rape is always a conspiracy of secular feminism? I guess I donât understand why anyone would object to requiring women to report rape to the police when weâve screamed at the tops of our voices about how every instance of reported rape is always, in every case, without exception, the victimâs fault. I mean like, am I the only one here whoâs confused or what? Help me out, bros.â
Held in the same auditorium as ComicCon was, thatâs how they think of it, one more convention for a special issue group. âDefinitional problem of rapeâ is about the lowpoint of any discussion of this issue and led by this balding, presidential wannabe.
Held in the same auditorium as ComicCon was
Now I have âLindsey Graham,â ârape,â and âCosPlayâ all working at the same time.
RaPE? WOmeN canât EVEN get PREgnanT From RAPe. The FEMALe bOdY has A WAY of SHUttING that ALL dowN.
Here is a nice and clear definition: If the intercourse was done without the consent of the woman, then it is rape. Really, it is not difficult.
Have any of the Republicans consulted Todd Akin or Richard Murdock yet? They should be hired, provided plane tickets and paid large sums of money to consult for the Republicans. John Boehner is single handedly responsible for this avoidable fiasco. He has hurled feces at the devout, religulous anti-abortion crowd that has assembled in Washington to celebrate the many accomplishments of the conservative republicans in congress.
Senator Who Has Never Seen a Real Life Vagina Passive-Aggressively Attempts to Control 150 Million of Them
(TPM headline re-edited for enhanced accuracy).
[quote] He also said that his goal is âto focus on the child. âŚâ [/quote] Up until itâs actually a child, and is born. After that, those nasty, poor, needy infants that donât work have no Place in America.
Rich kids we will make tax cuts for but not those others.
As a relatively recent convert from anti-abortion to pro-choice, I can sympathize with the struggling with the exceptions. In fact, it was the exceptions that changed my view. If I canât articulate clearly who should and should not be allowed to get an abortion, then I should not be in a position to make that choice at all.
It IS a Pro-Life CON.
This from the guy who âknoweth not a woman.â
Good LordâŚPerhaps someone was a tad premature gifting his cattle de-baller to a freshman Senator???
I would gladly contribute to a national fund to pay for a Turkish sailor to clarify âlegitimacyâ for Miz LindseyâŚ
Itâs so infuriating to see the eagerness these misfits display in using this issue as a wedge and political football.
Christian religio-fascist Teatroll response: âYou want definitions? Iâll give you oneâŚgetting raped defines the woman as a slut who shouldnât and canât be trusted to be making any decisions for herself or anyone else.â