Discussion for article #225057
Desperation. This is what it looks like.
wah wah wah
Thereâs stupid, thereâs Really Stupid, and then thereâs âSo Stupid Only The GOP Could Conjure Up This Shitâ.
All thatâs missing is if his long-term partner is a ni(CLANG!)
OK, so if they want to enforce laws that are being ignored, how about throwing the book at all the rest of the hatchetmen coordinating the Super-PACS with their Republican campaigns?
They have been scoffing at that law ever since Citizens United released their Koch Krakken, and theyâve piled up a mile high mess of easy breadcrumbs to follow, like Scott Walkerâs stupidly transparent scofflaw event.
Now THEREâS some laws that are being broken that need enforced, wouldnât you agree? It would sure be prosecution money much better-spent than chasing after drone cameras at gay marriages.
Photographing your own wedding is somehow a commercial use of drones?
Maybe he should assert his religious freedom rights to celebrate his nuptials⌠oh, thatâs right, that particular âfreedomâ is only for certain narrow-minded Christianists.
Comedy Gold: GOP loves drones 'cept when them icky hommsekshulls use 'em to capture love âstead of killinâ Mooslims.
So many walls, so much bullshit, not enough time.
Did they use the drone to shoot homo beams at the straights in attendance, turning them gay as well, or is it merely a theoretical capability the GOP is concerned may be used at future destruction of traditional family rituals?
ICYMI - This drone is designed to automatically follow and film the user.
Sean Patrick Maloney has just made the statement to every voter in the Hudson Valley that he thinks the rules donât apply to him.
Oh, as opposed to the legendary accountability from the other inhabitants of the Hudson Valley?
Yes, those beams consisting of the elusive âgaytronâ particle, comprised entirely of âstrange quarksâ that so far, much to the chagrin of CERN, only gay physicists have been able to isolate and cunningly weaponize.
A RC Drone enthusiast here at the office just told me that it is NOT illegal to use a drone to photograph your own wedding, provided the drone stays below a certain elevation.
Talk about a tempest in a teapot.
Todayâs GOP: putting the âmentalâ in âfundamentalâ since 1/20/2009.
And BENGHAZI!
Sean Maloney being married to Randy Florke at an episcopal church. There must be something to hate here.
A drone used on US soil, gay marriage, and a Democratic Congressman?
Of course the GOP would go apoplectic.
It actually isnât against âthe rulesâ, there is a policy statement by the FAA prohibiting commercial use; however that policy was never made official. A recent attempt to fine a man for filming from a drone was struck down on standing, because the FAA never went through proper channels to make the policy enforceable.
Itâs an idiot policy anyway, one which should really be corrected.
Wait, I thought the GOP loved drones? Was it a gay drone? Iâm so confused.